COMP

Compass RE

$10.26

+2.70%
Nov 11, 2026
Bobby Quantitative Model
Compass, Inc. operates an end-to-end residential real estate brokerage platform that pairs a national agent network with proprietary cloud-based software for CRM, marketing, and client service, generating revenue primarily through gross commission income in the U.S. housing market. As one of the largest U.S. residential brokerages by transaction volume, Compass is best characterized as a technology-enabled scale player attempting to convert brokerage share gains into operating leverage rather than a pure software platform. The current investor narrative centers on the company's pivot from years of cash burn toward GAAP profitability, with the recent Q3 2026 print showing positive net income and a swing to positive free cash flow, alongside a debt paydown and tuck-in acquisitions. Debate now hinges on whether margin gains are durable against a soft housing backdrop, and the stock's extreme beta and elevated short interest have made it a high-conviction battleground name, with sell-side sentiment recently tilting more constructive.

People also watch

CBRE Group

CBRE Group

CBRE

Analysis
Jones Lang LaSalle

Jones Lang LaSalle

JLL

Analysis
CoStar Group

CoStar Group

CSGP

Analysis
Cushman & Wakefield

Cushman & Wakefield

CWK

Analysis
Opendoor

Opendoor

OPEN

Analysis

BobbyInvestment Opinion: Should I buy COMP Today?

Rating: Buy (moderate conviction). The thesis is that Compass has crossed a genuine profitability inflection — Q3 2026 net income of $62 million versus a -$4.6 million loss a year earlier, with TTM free cash flow of $294.2 million — while trading at just 0.87x sales and 14.66x forward EPS of $0.97, leaving roughly +28.5% upside to the $13.125 average analyst target. That view is anchored by a 9 Buy / 3 Hold / 0 Sell consensus (mean rating 1.83) and a steady stream of reiterations from StoneX, BTIG, JP Morgan, UBS, Needham, Barclays and Oppenheimer, plus Zelman's upgrade to Outperform on 2026-10-21.

Supporting evidence is concrete: revenue grew 11.11% year over year to $3.897 billion in Q3 2026, EBITDA of $245 million reached a 6.29% margin, and Q2 2026 added $92 million of net income at a 2.14% margin, meaning three of the last four quarters were GAAP profitable. Free cash flow of $294.2 million on a $6.05 billion market cap is a roughly 4.9% FCF yield, funded by $248 million of quarterly operating cash flow against only $8 million of capex, and the company repaid $870 million of debt in Q1 2026 while still holding $841 million of cash. On valuation, 0.87x PS and 0.89x EV/sales sit near the bottom of the historical 0.67x-3.56x band, and the 1.56 PEG suggests the 11% growth is not overpriced relative to the earnings step-up implied by consensus.

The biggest risks that could invalidate this thesis are the razor-thin 2.23% gross margin and 1.59% net margin, which leave almost no buffer if home-sale volumes soften (Q4 2025 produced a -$42.6 million loss on a similar structure); a current ratio of 0.86 that flags liquidity tightness alongside $41 million of quarterly interest expense; and a 2.358 beta that amplifies any macro shock. The rating would upgrade to a high-conviction Buy if EBITDA margin holds above 6% through a seasonally weak Q4 and Q1 while revenue growth stays in double digits, and it would downgrade to Hold if gross margin slips back toward the 1.8% level seen in Q3 2025 or if the current ratio deteriorates further. Verdict: fairly valued to modestly undervalued — the 0.87x PS is near the low end of history and the 14.66x forward PE is among the most reasonable in the company's public life, but the discount versus the broader Real Estate sector is justified by sub-2% net margins, so this is a discount-to-its-own-history story rather than a peer-relative bargain.

Sign up to view all

COMP 12-Month Price Forecast

The forward view is modestly bullish because the profitability inflection is now evidenced by numbers rather than narrative — $294.2 million of TTM free cash flow and a 6.29% EBITDA margin — while the stock trades at 0.87x sales, near the bottom of its historical range, and 14.66x forward earnings. The 9-to-0 Buy-to-Sell analyst split and $13.125 average target support a base case of roughly $12.00-$13.50, but the 60% spread between the $10.00 low and $16.00 high targets, combined with a 2.358 beta and 3.34 short ratio, means the path will be volatile and position sizing matters as much as direction. I would upgrade to high confidence if Q4 2026 and Q1 2027 show EBITDA margin holding above 6% through the seasonally weak quarters, and I would downgrade to neutral if gross margin slips back toward the 1.8% level seen in Q3 2025 or if the current ratio deteriorates below 0.86.

Historical Price
Current Price $10.26
Average Target $12.75
High Target $16.00
Low Target $6.37

Wall Street consensus

Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on Compass RE's 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $12.46 and implied upside of +21.4% versus the current price.

Average Target

$12.46

12 analysts

Implied Upside

+21.4%

vs. current price

Analyst Count

12

covering this stock

Price Range

$9 - $15

Analyst target range

Buy
9 (75%)
Hold
3 (25%)
Sell
0 (0%)

Coverage is solid for a mid-cap at 12 analysts, with a Buy/Hold/Sell distribution of 9/3/0 and a consensus recommendation of "buy" (mean rating 1.83 on a 1-5 scale where lower is more bullish). The average target price of $13.125 implies roughly +28.5% upside from the current $10.21, and the consensus clearly leans bullish given zero sell ratings and a 75% Buy share. Recent institutional actions support that tilt, with Zelman & Assoc upgrading to Outperform from Neutral on 2026-10-21 and StoneX, BTIG, JP Morgan, UBS, Needham, Barclays, and Oppenheimer all reiterating Buy/Overweight/Outperform ratings through late October and early November.

The target range of $10.00 to $16.00 is wide — a 60% spread from low to high — signaling meaningful disagreement about the durability of the margin turnaround. The $16.00 high target implies roughly 57% upside and likely assumes sustained double-digit revenue growth, further EBITDA margin expansion beyond the current 6.29%, and multiple re-rating toward software-like levels as the platform story gains credibility. The $10.00 low target sits essentially at the current price and prices in margin compression, housing-volume weakness, or a stall in the profitability inflection, effectively assuming no upside from here. The wide dispersion, combined with a 2.358 beta and 3.34 short ratio, means target-price precision is low and volatility around earnings is likely to remain elevated.

Drowning in data?

Find the real signal!

Bulls vs Bears: COMP Investment Factors

The bull case currently has stronger evidence: the profitability inflection is confirmed across three of four quarters, free cash flow of $294.2 million is self-funding, and 9 of 12 analysts rate Buy with zero Sells at a $13.125 average target (+28.5% upside). The bear case rests on structural fragility rather than deterioration — 2.23% gross margins, a 0.86 current ratio, and a 2.358 beta mean the company has almost no buffer if housing volumes soften. The single most important tension is whether the 6.29% EBITDA margin and 1.59% net margin are durable operating leverage or a cyclical peak amplified by cost cuts; if margins hold through a soft housing backdrop, the 0.87x PS multiple re-rates toward the $16 high target, but if they compress, the $10 low target becomes the ceiling. Valuation is not demanding at 14.66x forward earnings, which tilts the risk/reward modestly positive, but the extreme volatility argues for position sizing well below benchmark weight.

Bullish

  • Profitability inflection now confirmed: Q3 2026 delivered $62 million of net income (1.59% net margin) versus a -$4.6 million loss in Q3 2025, and Q2 2026 added $92 million at a 2.14% margin. Three of the last four quarters were GAAP profitable, with only Q4 2025 (-$42.6 million) breaking the streak.
  • Free cash flow is real and self-funding: TTM free cash flow of $294.2 million on a $6.05 billion market cap implies roughly a 4.9% FCF yield, with Q3 2026 FCF of $240 million on $248 million of operating cash flow and just $8 million of capex. The company repaid $870 million of debt in Q1 2026 and still held $841 million of cash at quarter-end.
  • Valuation sits near historical low end: At 0.87x PS and 0.89x EV/sales, COMP trades near the bottom of its historical 0.67x-3.56x PS band, closer to the 2022 trough than the 2025 peak. The 14.66x forward PE against $0.97 consensus EPS is among the most reasonable earnings-based valuations in the company's public history.
  • Sell-side consensus leans strongly bullish: Nine of 12 analysts rate Buy with zero Sells (mean rating 1.83), and the $13.125 average target implies +28.5% upside from $10.21. Zelman & Assoc upgraded to Outperform on 2026-10-21, and StoneX, BTIG, JP Morgan, UBS, Needham, Barclays and Oppenheimer all reiterated bullish ratings through late October/early November.

Bearish

  • Razor-thin margins leave no cushion: Gross margin of 2.23% in Q3 2026 and a 1.59% net margin mean a modest volume or pricing shock could erase profitability entirely. Trailing EPS of -$0.0097 and ROE of -7.48% confirm the company has only just crossed into the black.
  • Liquidity flag from sub-1.0 current ratio: The current ratio of 0.86 is below 1.0, meaning current liabilities exceed current assets, and debt-to-equity of 0.61 remains after the $870 million repayment. Interest expense of $41 million per quarter is a meaningful drag on a business earning $62 million of quarterly net income.
  • Extreme volatility and short interest: Beta of 2.358 makes COMP roughly 2.4x as volatile as the market, and the 50.81% max drawdown shows how violent the swings have been. A 3.34 short ratio and a 10.74% single-day jump on 24.5 million shares signal event-driven positioning rather than stable accumulation.
  • Housing-volume dependence, not software economics: Gross commission income of $3.567 billion dwarfs franchise ($108 million) and service ($192 million) revenue, so the thesis is levered to home-sale volumes and agent splits rather than high-margin recurring software. The 11% growth rate is modest for a valuation that depends on margin conversion.

COMP Technical Analysis

Compass is in a volatile recovery uptrend that has stalled into a corrective phase: the stock is up 19.70% over the past year and 17.09% over six months, but sits at $10.21, only about 51% of its 52-week range between a $6.37 low and a $13.955 high. That mid-range positioning signals neither momentum extension nor a falling knife, but rather a stock digesting a large prior advance after peaking near $13.35 in mid-August. The 50.81% max drawdown underscores how violent the swings have been, and the current price is roughly 27% below the 52-week high while still 60% above the low.

Short-term momentum has turned sharply positive even as the intermediate trend deteriorated: the stock is up 11.10% over one month versus a 4.99% decline in SPY, a relative strength spread of +16.09 points, yet it is down 18.84% over three months against SPY's -4.91%, a -13.93 point relative drag. This divergence — strong recent bounce inside a three-month downtrend — is consistent with mean reversion off the September-October base near $8.76-$9.00 rather than a confirmed trend reversal, and the 10.74% single-day jump on 24.5 million shares of volume suggests event-driven repositioning rather than quiet accumulation. Year-to-date the stock is still down 2.76% while SPY is up 7.83%, a -10.59 point relative shortfall that reinforces the idea that the one-month surge is a recovery, not leadership.

Key technical levels are well defined: support sits at the 52-week low of $6.37 with a secondary shelf around $8.76-$9.00 where the October consolidation formed, while resistance is the $13.35-$13.955 zone marking the August high and 52-week ceiling. A breakout above $13.955 would confirm a new leg higher and likely force short covering given a 3.34 short ratio, whereas a breakdown below $8.76 would invalidate the recovery structure and reopen the $6.37 low. With a beta of 2.358, Compass is roughly 2.4x as volatile as the market, meaning position sizing must be materially smaller than a benchmark-weighted allocation to keep portfolio risk constant.

Beta

2.36

2.36x market volatility

Max Drawdown

-50.8%

Largest decline past year

52-Week Range

$6-$14

Price range past year

Annual Return

+8.8%

Cumulative gain past year

PeriodCOMP ReturnS&P 500
1m+16.3%-2.4%
3m-23.1%-2.3%
6m+30.2%+2.8%
1y+8.8%+11.3%
ytd-2.3%+11.4%

Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner

Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions

COMP Fundamental Analysis

Revenue is growing but unevenly: Q3 2026 revenue of $3.897 billion rose 11.11% year over year from $1.846 billion in Q3 2025, yet it declined sequentially from Q2 2026's $4.306 billion and Q1 2026's $2.704 billion, reflecting normal brokerage seasonality rather than demand collapse. The mix is overwhelmingly transaction-driven, with gross commission income of $3.567 billion dwarfing franchise revenue of $108 million and service revenue of $192 million, so the investment case remains levered to home-sale volumes and agent productivity rather than high-margin software. Consensus revenue estimates of roughly $19.0 billion imply continued top-line expansion, but the 11% growth rate is modest for a company whose valuation depends on margin conversion.

Profitability has inflected but remains thin: Q3 2026 net income was $62 million on a 1.59% net margin, a marked improvement from the -$4.6 million loss in Q3 2025, and Q2 2026 delivered $92 million of net income at a 2.14% margin. Gross margin is structurally low at 2.23% in Q3 2026 (versus 2.88% in Q2 and 25.74% in Q1, the latter distorted by cost classification), which is typical of pass-through commission brokerage economics where agent splits consume most of revenue. EBITDA of $245 million (6.29% margin) shows the operating leverage story is real, but the trailing EPS of -$0.0097 and ROE of -7.48% confirm the company has only just crossed into profitability and has little cushion if volumes soften.

Balance sheet and cash generation are adequate but not fortress-like: debt-to-equity is 0.61, the current ratio is 0.86 (below 1.0, a liquidity flag), and cash stood at $841 million at quarter-end after a $870 million debt repayment in Q1 2026. Free cash flow is the bright spot at $294.2 million TTM, with Q3 2026 FCF of $240 million on $248 million of operating cash flow and only $8 million of capex, implying an FCF yield of roughly 4.9% on the $6.05 billion market cap. ROA of 1.25% is low but positive, and the company is now funding operations internally rather than relying on external financing, though the sub-1.0 current ratio and 3.34 short ratio mean refinancing and sentiment risk remain live.

Quarterly Revenue

$3.9B

2026-09

Revenue YoY Growth

+111.1%

YoY Comparison

Gross Margin

2.2%

Latest Quarter

Free Cash Flow

$294200000.0B

Last 12 Months

Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)

Revenue Breakdown

Franchise
Gross Commission Income
Service
Service, Other

Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!

Valuation Analysis: Is COMP Overvalued?

Because trailing net income is marginally negative (EPS of -$0.0097, trailing PE of -105.7x), the PE ratio is not a usable primary metric; I therefore lead with the price-to-sales ratio of 0.87x and EV/sales of 0.887x, which are the appropriate anchors for a low-margin, high-revenue brokerage. The forward PE of 14.66x against consensus EPS of $0.97 is the more informative signal, implying the market expects a dramatic earnings step-up from the current run-rate and that investors are paying roughly 15x forward earnings for a business trading below 1x sales. The gap between the meaningless trailing multiple and the 14.66x forward figure encapsulates the entire bull case: profitability inflection is priced in, but only modestly.

On a peer basis, a 0.87x PS and 0.89x EV/sales are deep discounts to the broader Real Estate sector, where software-like and asset-heavy names typically command multiples well above 2x sales, and the 7.73x price-to-book looks rich only because the equity base is thin after years of losses. The 102.1x EV/EBITDA is distorted by the low trailing EBITDA base and should not be read as a premium signal; normalized against the $245 million quarterly EBITDA run-rate, the effective multiple compresses toward the mid-teens. The discount to sector averages appears justified by the 1.59% net margin and 2.23% gross margin, which are far below typical real estate services economics, but the 14.66x forward PE and 1.56 PEG suggest the market is not demanding a heroic re-rating to justify the price.

Historically, Compass's PS ratio has ranged from roughly 0.67x in Q3 2022 to 3.56x in Q4 2025, and the current 0.87x sits near the low end of that band, closer to the 2022 trough than the 2025 peak. Its historical PE has swung between -549x and +60.9x, making the current 14.66x forward figure one of the most reasonable earnings-based valuations in the company's public history. The read-through is that the market is pricing modest optimism on margins rather than euphoria, but the low-end PS positioning also reflects genuine skepticism that the profitability inflection is durable.

PE

-105.7x

Latest Quarter

vs. Historical

Low-End

5-Year PE Range 19x~28x

vs. Industry Avg

26.2x

Industry PE ~26.2x*

EV/EBITDA

102.1x

Enterprise Value Multiple

Investment Risk Disclosure

Financial and operational risks are dominated by the absence of a margin buffer: Q3 2026 gross margin of 2.23% and net margin of 1.59% mean that a low-single-digit decline in gross commission income could push the company back to losses, as happened in Q4 2025 (-$42.6 million net loss). The current ratio of 0.86 is below 1.0, a genuine liquidity flag, and quarterly interest expense of $41 million consumes roughly two-thirds of Q3's $62 million net income. Revenue concentration is extreme — $3.567 billion of gross commission income versus $300 million combined franchise and service revenue — so the entire profitability story hinges on U.S. home-sale volumes and agent retention rather than diversified, recurring software revenue. Trailing EPS of -$0.0097 and ROE of -7.48% confirm the company has only just crossed into profitability and has little cushion if volumes soften.

Market and competitive risks center on valuation compression and volatility: beta of 2.358 means COMP amplifies market moves roughly 2.4x, and the 50.81% max drawdown demonstrates the damage that can occur in a sector rotation. The stock is down 18.84% over three months against SPY's -4.91%, a -13.93 point relative drag, even after an 11.10% one-month bounce that outperformed SPY by 16.09 points — a divergence consistent with mean reversion rather than a confirmed trend reversal. A 3.34 short ratio makes the shares vulnerable to sharp squeezes in both directions, and the 60% spread between the $10.00 low and $16.00 high analyst targets signals that even professional coverage cannot agree on the durability of the margin turnaround. Competitive pressure from traditional brokerages and discount models, plus regulatory scrutiny of agent commission structures, remains a structural overhang on the pass-through economics.

In a worst-case scenario, a housing-volume downturn coincides with agent-split pressure, compressing the 6.29% EBITDA margin back toward zero and reversing the free-cash-flow inflection, while the 0.86 current ratio forces expensive refinancing. That chain of events would likely take the stock back toward its $6.37 52-week low, a decline of roughly -38% from the current $10.21, and the $10.00 analyst low target offers essentially no downside protection. The 50.81% max drawdown is the relevant historical benchmark for how far sentiment can carry the shares in an adverse tape, and with a 2.358 beta, a broad market correction of 10% could plausibly translate into a 20-25% decline in COMP before any company-specific news.

FAQ

The most severe risk is margin fragility: a 2.23% gross margin and 1.59% net margin mean a low-single-digit decline in gross commission income could return the company to losses, exactly as Q4 2025 showed with a -$42.6 million net loss. Second is balance-sheet and liquidity risk, with a current ratio of 0.86 below 1.0, debt-to-equity of 0.61, and $41 million of quarterly interest expense consuming roughly two-thirds of Q3 2026's $62 million net income. Third is market and volatility risk, where a 2.358 beta and 50.81% max drawdown mean macro shocks are amplified, and a 3.34 short ratio makes moves violent in both directions. Fourth is concentration and regulatory risk: $3.567 billion of gross commission income dwarfs $300 million of franchise and service revenue, so the thesis depends on U.S. home-sale volumes and on agent commission structures remaining intact.

The base case carries 55% probability with a $12.00-$13.50 range, assuming roughly $19.0 billion of consensus revenue, EBITDA margin holding near 6.29%, and forward EPS of $0.97 broadly achieved, which would take the stock toward the $13.125 average target. The bull case at 25% probability targets $14.50-$16.00, requiring housing volumes to stabilize on lower mortgage rates, EBITDA margin to expand beyond 6.29%, and analyst revisions toward the $16.00 high. The bear case at 20% probability targets $6.37-$10.00, driven by volume weakness, agent-split pressure compressing margins toward zero, and a reversal of the free-cash-flow inflection. The base case is most likely because it requires only that the current margin trend persist rather than accelerate; the key assumption is that the 6.29% EBITDA margin is durable operating leverage rather than a cyclical peak.

The trailing PE of -105.7x is meaningless given trailing EPS of -$0.0097, so the relevant anchors are 0.87x PS, 0.89x EV/sales, and 14.66x forward earnings on $0.97 consensus EPS. That PS multiple sits near the bottom of the historical 0.67x-3.56x band, closer to the 2022 trough than the 2025 peak, and the forward PE is among the most reasonable earnings-based valuations in the company's public history. The 7.73x price-to-book looks rich only because the equity base is thin after years of losses, and the 102.1x EV/EBITDA is distorted by a low trailing EBITDA base rather than signaling a premium. The market is therefore pricing modest optimism about margin durability, not euphoria — but the discount to the broader Real Estate sector is justified by a 1.59% net margin. Verdict: fairly valued to modestly undervalued relative to its own history, not a peer-relative bargain.

From a risk/reward standpoint the setup is modestly favorable but not clean: the $13.125 average analyst target implies about +28.5% upside from $10.21, while the $10.00 low target sits essentially at the current price and the $6.37 52-week low represents roughly -38% downside in a housing downturn. The reward side is supported by 9 Buy ratings against zero Sells, a 14.66x forward PE on $0.97 consensus EPS, and $294.2 million of TTM free cash flow against a $6.05 billion market cap. The downside is that a 2.23% gross margin and 0.86 current ratio leave almost no buffer, and a 2.358 beta means a 10% market correction could translate into a 20-25% decline in COMP. It is a reasonable buy for risk-tolerant investors with a 12-18 month horizon who size the position small and accept earnings-date volatility; it is not appropriate for capital-preservation portfolios.

Compass is a high-volatility, zero-dividend, early-stage profitability story, which argues for a medium-to-long holding period of at least 12-18 months rather than short-term trading. The 2.358 beta, 50.81% max drawdown, and 3.34 short ratio mean daily and weekly price action is dominated by positioning and macro noise — the stock jumped 10.74% in a single session on 24.5 million shares — so short-term traders face wide, unpredictable swings. Longer-term holders can instead underwrite the fundamental trajectory: three of four quarters GAAP profitable, $294.2 million of TTM free cash flow, and a 0.87x PS near the low end of history. Earnings visibility remains limited by the 2.23% gross margin and housing-volume dependence, so a staged entry across the next two quarterly prints is preferable to a single lump-sum purchase.