General Motors
GM
$87.16
+1.80%
General Motors Company is a global automotive manufacturer operating through three primary segments — GM North America, GM International, and GM Financial — producing vehicles under brands including Chevrolet, GMC, Cadillac, and Buick, while its captive finance arm provides automotive lending and leasing. GM is a legacy industry heavyweight that reclaimed U.S. market share leadership in 2022 and held 17.4% U.S. share in 2025, distinguishing itself through scale, a full-size truck and SUV profit engine, and an emerging personal autonomous-vehicle strategy after refocusing its Cruise unit away from robotaxi operations. The current investor narrative centers on a striking earnings inflection: GM raised its 2026 profit outlook to as much as $16 billion — its second raise of the year — driven by steady vehicle pricing and sharply shrinking EV losses, which has reframed the stock as a deep-value cash generator trading near 6x earnings. Offsetting this bullish turn are persistent China segment losses, tariff exposure including a threatened 50% Canadian tariff and new Section 301 measures, and a C$1 billion-plus Canadian investment pledge that signals long-term confidence but near-term cost headwinds. The debate among investors is whether GM's North American profit durability and aggressive buybacks can outweigh international drag and policy risk, making this a classic cyclical value-versus-tariff-overhang story.…
GM
General Motors
$87.16
Related headlines
Investment Opinion: Should I buy GM Today?
Rating: Buy. GM offers a compelling deep-value opportunity anchored by a 5.77x forward PE, $12.48 billion in trailing free cash flow, and a second 2026 profit guidance raise to as much as $16 billion, with the analyst consensus 'buy' rating (mean 1.73) and average target price of $101.64 implying 18.7% upside. The core thesis is that GM's North American profit engine, stable vehicle pricing, and shrinking EV losses are being undervalued by a market overly focused on tariff and China risks.
Supporting evidence is substantial: the forward PE of 5.77x is far below the broader market's ~20x and the sector's typical 1.0x-1.5x PS range, while GM's PS ratio of 0.40x sits near the low end of its historical range. Revenue has been remarkably stable at $43.6-$48.6 billion per quarter despite a -0.9% YoY decline in Q1 2026, and profitability has recovered sharply with Q1 2026 net income of $2.63 billion (6.02% net margin) and 6.71% operating margin. Free cash flow of $12.48 billion represents a 16.7% FCF yield, funding $800 million of buybacks and $223 million of dividends in Q1 2026 alone. The implied upside to the $101.64 consensus target is 18.7%, with the high target of $132.00 suggesting 54% upside if multiple expansion occurs.
The biggest risks that could invalidate this thesis are tariff escalation (threatened 50% Canadian tariff and Section 301 measures), continued China losses, and a cyclical demand downturn that exposes the 2.13x debt-to-equity ratio. This Buy would downgrade to Hold if forward PE expands above 8x without corresponding earnings growth, or to Sell if North American margins compress below 5% or China losses widen materially. Conversely, an upgrade to Strong Buy would require resolution of tariff threats and evidence of sustained China improvement. At 5.77x forward earnings with a 16.7% FCF yield, GM is undervalued relative to both its own history (which has ranged from 3.5x to 12x PE) and its peer group, though the discount is partially justified by legitimate policy and cyclical risks.
Sign up to view all
GM 12-Month Price Forecast
GM presents a compelling deep-value opportunity with a 5.77x forward PE and 16.7% free cash flow yield, supported by a second 2026 profit guidance raise to as much as $16 billion and analyst consensus targeting $101.64 (18.7% upside). The bull case is grounded in North American profit durability, stable pricing, and shrinking EV losses, while the bear case rests on tariff escalation, China losses, and earnings volatility that included a $3.31 billion loss in Q4 2025. At 84% of its 52-week range with a beta of 1.321, the stock has strong momentum but limited cushion against mean reversion. I would upgrade to high confidence if tariffs are resolved favorably and China losses narrow, or downgrade to bearish if North American margins compress below 5% or the 50% Canadian tariff is implemented without offsetting cost reductions.
Wall Street consensus
Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on General Motors's 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $101.64 and implied upside of +16.6% versus the current price.
Average Target
$101.64
0 analysts
Implied Upside
+16.6%
vs. current price
Analyst Count
—
covering this stock
Price Range
$61 - $132
Analyst target range
GM is covered by 25 analysts, and the consensus recommendation is "buy" with a recommendation mean of 1.73 (where 1.0 is a strong buy and 5.0 is a sell), indicating a moderately bullish consensus. The average target price is $101.64, which implies +18.7% upside from the current price of $85.62, while the consensus EPS estimate of $14.81 for the coming year supports the low forward PE of 5.77x. The sentiment leans bullish but not overwhelmingly so — the 1.73 mean suggests most analysts rate the stock a buy or overweight, with few outright sells, consistent with the institutional ratings showing repeated Outperform/Overweight/Buy reiterations from RBC Capital, JP Morgan, Citigroup, Wedbush, and Evercore ISI, offset by Wells Fargo's persistent Underweight stance. The bullish tilt is grounded in GM's raised 2026 profit guidance, shrinking EV losses, and strong North American pricing, though the presence of at least one notable bear (Wells Fargo) and the modest 18.7% implied upside suggest the market has already priced in much of the good news. The target range is exceptionally wide, spanning from a low of $61.00 to a high of $132.00 — a 116% spread between the extremes — which signals high uncertainty and divergent views on GM's trajectory. The high target of $132.00 implies roughly 54% upside and likely assumes multiple expansion toward 8x-9x forward earnings, sustained North American margin strength, resolution of tariff threats, and a turnaround in China, effectively pricing in a best-case scenario where the earnings recovery is fully validated. The low target of $61.00 implies roughly 29% downside and likely prices in margin compression from tariffs, continued China losses, a cyclical demand downturn, or a recession that would crush auto sales and expose GM's 2.13x leverage. The wide spread, combined with the recent pattern of reiterated rather than upgraded ratings (no fresh upgrades in the institutional data, only reiterations through July 2026), suggests analysts are maintaining positions rather than aggressively raising conviction — a signal that the stock's next move depends heavily on tariff developments and Q3 2026 earnings, with the consensus target of $101.64 representing a reasonable but not guaranteed destination if the fundamental recovery continues.
Drowning in data?
Find the real signal!
Bulls vs Bears: GM Investment Factors
The bull case currently has stronger evidence, anchored by GM's 5.77x forward PE, $12.48 billion in trailing free cash flow, and a second 2026 profit guidance raise to as much as $16 billion. The bear case rests on legitimate but less quantifiable threats: tariff policy uncertainty, persistent China losses, and extreme quarterly earnings volatility that included a $3.31 billion loss in Q4 2025. The single most important tension is whether GM's North American profit durability can withstand the threatened 50% Canadian tariff and Section 301 measures — if tariffs are absorbed without major margin damage, the stock's deep-value multiple should re-rate toward the $101.64 consensus target; if tariffs bite into North American margins, the 2.13x debt-to-equity leverage and thin 1.17 current ratio leave limited cushion. At 84% of its 52-week range with a beta of 1.321, GM offers compelling value but requires tolerance for policy-driven volatility.
Bullish
- Deep value at 5.77x forward earnings: GM trades at a forward PE of just 5.77x based on consensus EPS of $14.81, a 76% discount to its trailing PE of 24.42x and far below the broader market's ~20x. This extreme multiple compression implies the market is pricing in severe tariff and cyclical risk that may not materialize given management's raised 2026 profit outlook of up to $16 billion.
- Massive free cash flow generation: GM generated $12.48 billion in trailing free cash flow, equating to a 16.7% FCF yield on its $74.77 billion market cap. This cash generation funded $800 million of buybacks and $223 million of dividends in Q1 2026 alone, and provides a substantial buffer against tariff headwinds.
- Earnings inflection with second guidance raise: GM raised its 2026 profit outlook to as much as $16 billion, its second raise of the year, driven by steady vehicle pricing and sharply shrinking EV losses. Q1 2026 net income rebounded to $2.63 billion (6.02% net margin) from a Q4 2025 loss of $3.31 billion, demonstrating the core business can generate strong profitability when EV drag diminishes.
- Strong relative momentum and uptrend: GM has gained 45.84% over the past year versus 16.22% for SPY, a relative strength advantage of 29.62 percentage points. The stock sits at 84% of its 52-week range, confirming a durable recovery trend rather than a value trap, and has held above $83 despite August tariff headlines.
Bearish
- Tariff overhang threatens margins: GM faces a threatened 50% Canadian tariff and new Section 301 measures that could significantly compress North American margins, which account for effectively all of the company's profit. The C$1 billion-plus Canadian investment pledge signals long-term confidence but adds near-term cost headwinds in an already tariff-exposed environment.
- China segment remains a persistent drag: GM International generated just $2.86 billion in revenue versus $36.40 billion from GM North America, with China specifically flagged by management as a nagging problem. Continued losses in this segment offset North American strength and represent a structural earnings headwind that shows no clear resolution timeline.
- Extreme earnings volatility and loss quarters: GM swung from a Q4 2025 net loss of $3.31 billion (-7.31% net margin) to Q1 2026 net income of $2.63 billion, illustrating severe quarterly earnings volatility. The Q4 2025 quarter included a -$4.08 billion other-expenses swing and negative gross profit, raising questions about whether such losses could recur.
- Leveraged balance sheet with thin liquidity: GM carries a debt-to-equity ratio of 2.13x and a current ratio of just 1.17, reflecting the capital-intensive, high-debt structure typical of captive-finance-backed automakers. ROE is a modest 4.41% and ROA just 2.25%, indicating that debt service consumes a meaningful share of cash generation and constrains financial flexibility if tariffs compress margins.
GM Technical Analysis
GM is in a sustained uptrend, with the current price of $85.62 representing a 45.84% gain over the past year versus just 16.22% for SPY — a relative strength advantage of 29.62 percentage points. The stock sits at roughly 84% of its 52-week range, calculated as ($85.62 - $54.33) / ($91.85 - $54.33), placing it in the upper quartile of its annual band and signaling that momentum buyers remain in control, though the proximity to highs leaves limited cushion against mean reversion. This positioning near the top of the range, combined with a 52-week low of $54.33 that is now 36.6% below the current price, confirms a durable recovery trend rather than a value trap. Recent momentum has cooled, however: the 1-month change of -1.31% and 3-month change of +5.06% show deceleration from the 6-month gain of 18.28%, and the 1-month relative strength of -0.25% versus SPY indicates GM is now slightly lagging the market after a powerful July rally that peaked near $90.30 on July 28. The divergence between the strong 1-year trend (+45.84%) and the mildly negative 1-month trend (-1.31%) suggests a healthy consolidation or temporary pullback within an intact uptrend rather than a reversal, especially since the stock has held above $83 despite the August tariff headlines. Key resistance sits at the 52-week high of $91.85, and a breakout above that level would signal renewed institutional conviction and likely open a move toward the analyst consensus target; support rests at the 52-week low of $54.33, with intermediate support around the $83-$84 zone where the stock has repeatedly found buyers in August and September. With a beta of 1.321, GM is roughly 32% more volatile than the broader market, meaning position sizing should be adjusted accordingly — a 1% market move implies roughly a 1.32% move in GM, and the maximum drawdown of -16.2% over the period illustrates the downside risk in a tariff-driven selloff.
Beta
1.32
1.32x market volatility
Max Drawdown
-16.2%
Largest decline past year
52-Week Range
$54-$92
Price range past year
Annual Return
+49.0%
Cumulative gain past year
| Period | GM Return | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1m | +0.4% | -2.0% |
| 3m | +5.6% | +1.4% |
| 6m | +18.5% | +15.0% |
| 1y | +49.0% | +15.7% |
| ytd | +7.6% | +11.6% |
Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner
Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions
GM Fundamental Analysis
GM's revenue trajectory is essentially flat-to-slightly-declining at the top line, with the most recent quarter (Q1 2026, ended March 31, 2026) posting $43.62 billion in revenue against $44.02 billion in the year-ago quarter, a YoY decline of 0.9%. The multi-quarter trend shows revenue oscillating in a narrow $43.6-$48.6 billion band, with Q4 2025 at $45.29 billion, Q3 2025 at $48.59 billion, and Q2 2025 at $47.12 billion — no meaningful growth, but remarkable stability for a cyclical automaker. Segment data reveals the concentration risk: GM North America generated $36.40 billion (or $39.35 billion on the GMNA basis) versus just $2.86 billion from GM International and $4.28 billion from GM Financial, meaning North America accounts for the overwhelming majority of revenue and effectively all of the profit, while the international business — particularly China — remains a drag that management has flagged as a nagging problem. The investment case therefore rests not on revenue growth but on profit capture from a stable revenue base, which is precisely what the 2026 guidance raise to as much as $16 billion implies. Profitability has swung violently but is now recovering: Q1 2026 net income was $2.63 billion with a 6.02% net margin and 11.45% gross margin, a sharp improvement from the Q4 2025 loss of -$3.31 billion (net margin -7.31%, gross margin -2.48%) that was distorted by charges. The trailing gross margin of 10.86% and operating margin of just 1.57% reflect the low-margin nature of volume automotive manufacturing, where single-digit operating margins are typical, but the Q1 2026 operating margin of 6.71% shows the core business can generate respectable profitability when EV losses shrink and pricing holds. The key fundamental question is whether the Q4 2025 loss was a one-time event — the quarter included a -$4.08 billion other-expenses swing and negative gross profit — or a recurring risk, and the Q1 2026 rebound to $2.63 billion of net income with $3.68 billion EBITDA strongly suggests the former. Balance sheet and cash flow metrics reveal a leveraged but cash-generative enterprise: debt-to-equity stands at 2.13x, the current ratio is a thin 1.17, and ROE is a modest 4.41% with ROA of just 2.25%, reflecting the capital-intensive, high-debt structure typical of captive-finance-backed automakers. Free cash flow is the bright spot, with TTM FCF of $12.48 billion and Q1 2026 FCF of $1.44 billion despite $1.51 billion of capex, while the company returned capital via $800 million of buybacks and $223 million of dividends in the quarter. Cash on hand was $24.06 billion at quarter-end, providing substantial liquidity, but the 2.13x debt-to-equity ratio and 0.023 cash-flow-to-debt ratio from historical data indicate that debt service consumes a meaningful share of cash generation — manageable given the FCF yield implied by $12.48 billion against a $74.77 billion market cap (roughly 16.7%), but a constraint if tariffs compress North American margins.
Quarterly Revenue
$43.6B
2026-03
Revenue YoY Growth
-0.9%
YoY Comparison
Gross Margin
11.5%
Latest Quarter
Free Cash Flow
$12.5B
Last 12 Months
Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)
Revenue Breakdown
Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!
Valuation Analysis: Is GM Overvalued?
Because GM is profitable on a trailing basis — Q1 2026 net income of $2.63 billion and trailing EPS of $0.036 (distorted by the Q4 2025 loss) — the PE ratio is the appropriate primary metric, though the trailing PE of 24.42x is misleading given the loss quarter. The forward PE of 5.77x is far more informative and reflects the market's expectation that GM will earn roughly $14.81 per share in the coming year (the analyst consensus EPS estimate), which at the current $85.62 price implies the stock trades at under 6x forward earnings. The enormous gap between the trailing PE of 24.42x and forward PE of 5.77x — a 76% compression — signals that the market expects a dramatic earnings recovery, consistent with management's raised 2026 profit outlook of up to $16 billion and the normalization of EV losses. On a price-to-sales basis, GM trades at just 0.40x, and its EV/Sales of 0.98x and EV/EBITDA of 9.99x are modest for a company of its scale. Peer comparison within the Auto Manufacturers industry shows GM trading at a significant discount on most metrics: the PS ratio of 0.40x is well below the sector's typical 1.0x-1.5x range for established automakers, and the forward PE of 5.77x is far below the broader market's ~20x and below many auto peers, reflecting the market's skepticism about cyclical earnings durability and tariff risk. The PB ratio of 1.22x is modest but not distressed, and the PEG ratio of -0.50 is negative only because of the trailing earnings distortion, rendering it uninformative. The discount appears partially justified by GM's thin 1.57% operating margin, 2.13x debt-to-equity leverage, and China losses, but the magnitude of the discount — particularly the sub-6x forward PE against a company generating $12.48 billion in TTM free cash flow — suggests the market is pricing in substantial tariff and cyclical risk that may prove excessive if guidance holds. Historical context shows GM's PE ratio has ranged from roughly 3.5x to 12x over the past several years, with the stock frequently trading in the 4x-6x range during 2023-2024 (e.g., 3.46x in Q1 2025, 4.42x in Q1 2024, 5.65x in Q4 2023), so the current forward PE of 5.77x sits in the middle-to-upper portion of its own historical band — not a screaming bargain relative to its own history, but reasonable given the earnings recovery. The PS ratio of 0.40x, however, is near the low end of its historical range (which has spanned roughly 1.0x-2.9x since 2021), suggesting the market is capitalizing GM's revenue at a historically depressed multiple, which could represent either a value opportunity or a structural de-rating driven by tariff and competitive concerns.
PE
24.4x
Latest Quarter
vs. Historical
High-End
5-Year PE Range 3x~12x
vs. Industry Avg
N/A
Industry PE ~N/A*
EV/EBITDA
10.0x
Enterprise Value Multiple
Investment Risk Disclosure
GM's financial risk profile is dominated by its leveraged balance sheet and earnings volatility. Debt-to-equity stands at 2.13x with a current ratio of just 1.17, meaning the company operates with thin liquidity cushion relative to its obligations. The Q4 2025 quarter delivered a $3.31 billion net loss (-7.31% net margin) with negative gross profit of -$1.12 billion, demonstrating that a single bad quarter can erase a substantial portion of annual earnings. While trailing free cash flow of $12.48 billion and $24.06 billion in cash provide substantial buffers, the 0.023 cash-flow-to-debt ratio indicates debt service consumes a meaningful share of cash generation, and the 1.57% trailing operating margin leaves little room for error if pricing deteriorates or costs rise.
Market and competitive risks center on GM's premium-free valuation and tariff exposure. The stock trades at 5.77x forward earnings, a discount that could persist or widen if the threatened 50% Canadian tariff and new Section 301 measures compress North American margins, which account for effectively all of the company's profit. With a beta of 1.321, GM is roughly 32% more volatile than the broader market, meaning a 1% market decline implies a 1.32% drop in GM, amplifying downside in risk-off environments. The 116% spread between analyst low ($61) and high ($132) targets signals deep disagreement about GM's trajectory, and Wells Fargo's persistent Underweight rating highlights that not all institutional investors are convinced by the value thesis. Competitive pressure from Stellantis' North American turnaround and the broader EV transition add further uncertainty to GM's long-term positioning.
The worst-case scenario would involve a combination of tariff escalation, China losses widening, and a cyclical demand downturn that exposes GM's leverage. If the 50% Canadian tariff is implemented and Section 301 measures bite, North American margins could compress sharply, potentially pushing earnings below the $14.81 consensus EPS estimate and triggering multiple compression. In this scenario, GM could fall toward its 52-week low of $54.33, representing a 36.6% decline from the current $85.62 price, or toward the analyst low target of $61.00, a 28.7% decline. The maximum drawdown of -16.2% over the past period illustrates that even without a full bear case, tariff-driven selloffs can be severe, and a recession that crushes auto sales would amplify the damage given the 2.13x debt-to-equity ratio.
FAQ
The most severe risk is tariff escalation, specifically the threatened 50% Canadian tariff and new Section 301 measures, which could compress North American margins that account for effectively all of GM's profit. Second is China segment losses, with GM International generating just $2.86 billion in revenue versus $36.40 billion from North America, representing a persistent drag with no clear resolution. Third is earnings volatility and balance sheet leverage — GM swung from a $3.31 billion Q4 2025 loss to $2.63 billion Q1 2026 net income, and the 2.13x debt-to-equity ratio with a 1.17 current ratio leaves limited cushion if demand deteriorates. Fourth is cyclical demand risk, as a recession would crush auto sales and expose GM's high fixed-cost structure, potentially driving the stock toward its $54.33 52-week low.
The 12-month forecast has three scenarios: a base case (50% probability) targeting $95-$105, aligned with the $101.64 analyst average, assuming GM meets its $14.81 EPS consensus and tariff impacts remain manageable; a bull case (25% probability) targeting $115-$132, requiring tariff resolution, margin expansion, and China improvement; and a bear case (25% probability) targeting $54-$61, driven by tariff escalation, China losses widening, and a cyclical downturn. The base case is most likely, with the key assumption being that North American pricing remains steady and gross margins hold near 11%. The wide analyst target range of $61-$132 reflects genuine uncertainty, but the 5.77x forward PE and 16.7% FCF yield provide a valuation floor that limits extreme downside absent a severe recession.
GM is undervalued on most metrics, trading at a forward PE of 5.77x versus the broader market's ~20x and a PS ratio of 0.40x that sits near the low end of its historical range of 1.0x-2.9x since 2021. The EV/EBITDA of 9.99x and PB ratio of 1.22x are modest for a company generating $12.48 billion in trailing free cash flow. However, the forward PE of 5.77x sits in the middle-to-upper portion of GM's own historical band of 3.5x-12x, suggesting the stock is not a screaming bargain relative to its own history. The market is pricing in substantial tariff and cyclical risk, implying it expects earnings to be volatile and potentially impaired. If GM delivers on its $16 billion profit outlook, the multiple should expand toward 7x-8x, supporting a move toward the $101.64 consensus target.
From a risk/reward perspective, GM offers a favorable setup with 18.7% upside to the $101.64 analyst consensus target against 28.7% downside to the $61.00 low target, though the probability-weighted view is skewed positively given the 50% base case. The stock trades at just 5.77x forward earnings with a 16.7% free cash flow yield, providing a margin of safety that is rare for a company of GM's scale. However, the biggest downside risk is tariff escalation — the threatened 50% Canadian tariff could compress North American margins that account for effectively all of the company's profit. GM is a good buy for value-oriented investors with a 12-18 month horizon who can tolerate a beta of 1.321 and potential drawdowns toward the $54.33 52-week low. It is less suitable for short-term traders given the policy-driven volatility and for growth investors given flat revenue.
GM is best suited for medium-to-long-term investment with a minimum holding period of 12-18 months, allowing time for the earnings recovery to validate and tariff uncertainties to resolve. The stock's beta of 1.321 and maximum drawdown of -16.2% make it unsuitable for short-term trading unless the investor is actively managing tariff-related volatility. The 0.88% dividend yield and $800 million quarterly buyback program provide income and support for patient holders, while the 5.77x forward PE offers value that should be realized as earnings normalize. Short-term traders could exploit the $83-$84 support and $91.85 resistance range, but the policy-driven nature of recent moves makes timing difficult. Long-term investors should focus on GM's cash generation and market share leadership (17.4% U.S. share in 2025) rather than quarterly earnings noise.
