Snap-on
SNA
$374.75
+0.39%
Snap-on Incorporated is a manufacturer of premium hand tools, power tools, diagnostics, shop equipment, and repair information systems sold primarily to professional automotive technicians, independent repair shops, dealerships, and industrial customers, operating within the Industrials sector's tools and accessories industry. The company is best understood as a high-margin, brand-moated niche franchise rather than a volume-driven tool maker: its distinctive franchisee-operated mobile van distribution model, direct relationships with technicians who buy tools at their own expense, and a captive financial services arm that finances both franchisees and end customers create unusually sticky recurring revenue and pricing power. The current investor debate centers on a visible top-line stall — most recent quarterly revenue of $1.28 billion was down 0.74% year over year and the Q3 print missed both earnings and revenue estimates — which raises questions about whether Snap-on is in a cyclical tools-replacement air pocket or facing structural pressure on technician spending. Bulls point to resilient margins, a fortress balance sheet, and a 2.5% dividend yield as support, while bears focus on decelerating growth, soft commercial and industrial demand, and a stock that has lagged the market over the past three and twelve months.…
SNA
Snap-on
$374.75
Related headlines
People also watch
Stanley Black & Decker
SWK
Lincoln Electric
LECO
RBC Bearings Incorporated
RBC
Toro
TTC
Timken Company
TKR
Investment Opinion: Should I buy SNA Today?
Rating: Hold, with a constructive bias. The thesis is that Snap-on is a high-quality, 52%-gross-margin franchise trading at an undemanding 17.65x forward earnings, but with revenue down 0.74% year over year and Q3 EPS of $4.71 versus $5.01 a year ago, there is no catalyst to force a re-rating yet. The analyst consensus of "buy" (5 Buy / 5 Hold / 1 Sell, mean score 2.45) and an average target of $404.11 imply roughly 10.0% upside from $367.22 — positive but modest, consistent with a fairly valued compounder rather than a mispriced opportunity.
Supporting evidence: (1) valuation is undemanding — 17.98x trailing and 17.65x forward PE, 12.11x EV/EBITDA, and 3.55x price-to-sales for a business with 19.7% net margins and 17.1% ROE; (2) the balance sheet is a fortress — debt-to-equity of 0.224, current ratio of 4.79, $1.67 billion of cash, and $1.012 billion of trailing free cash flow (a 5.5% FCF yield) that comfortably funds $126.1 million of quarterly dividends plus $87.1 million of buybacks; (3) gross margin held at 52.4% versus 52.2% a year earlier, showing pricing power intact even as operating margin compressed 220 basis points to 24.7%; and (4) the risk/reward skews favorably — the $340 low target is only 7.4% below the current price while the $485 high target is 32.1% above, and a beta of 0.746 with a -15.19% max drawdown limits downside participation.
Risks and conditions: the biggest threats are (1) the revenue stall proving structural rather than a cyclical tools-replacement air pocket, which would keep operating deleverage grinding EPS lower toward the $20.68 low estimate; (2) further estimate cuts after the October 22 Q3 miss, which would compress the multiple from the middle-to-upper portion of its 12x-20x historical band; and (3) broad-based segment softness across Tools ($471.5 million), Repair Systems ($454.7 million), and Commercial and Industrial ($404.3 million) leaving no offset. This Hold would upgrade to Buy if revenue returns to positive year-over-year growth and operating margin recovers above 26%, or if the stock pulls back toward the $340 low target (roughly 15x forward EPS); it would downgrade to Sell if revenue declines accelerate beyond -3% or operating margin falls below 23%. Verdict: fairly valued versus its own history (17.98x trailing versus a 12x-20x band) but cheap versus its quality — a stock to accumulate on weakness, not chase here.
Sign up to view all
SNA 12-Month Price Forecast
Snap-on is a quality franchise in a cyclical air pocket, not a broken business — 52.4% gross margin, 19.7% net margin, 17.1% ROE, and a 5.5% FCF yield are intact, and the 17.65x forward multiple is undemanding for that quality. But the near-term evidence favors the bears: revenue is down 0.74% year over year, operating margin has compressed 220 basis points to 24.7%, EPS has turned negative, and the October 22 Q3 print missed on both lines. The 5 Buy / 5 Hold / 1 Sell split with no recent upgrades means the $404.11 consensus average is more likely to drift lower than higher until order trends stabilize. I would upgrade to bullish if revenue returns to positive year-over-year growth and operating margin recovers above 26%, or if the stock pulls back toward the $340 low target; I would downgrade to bearish if revenue declines accelerate beyond -3% or operating margin falls below 23%. With the stock at $367.22 — roughly mid-range and 7.4% above the bear target versus 32.1% below the bull target — the setup favors patience over urgency.
Wall Street consensus
Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on Snap-on's 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $404.11 and implied upside of +7.8% versus the current price.
Average Target
$404.11
11 analysts
Implied Upside
+7.8%
vs. current price
Analyst Count
11
covering this stock
Price Range
$340 - $485
Analyst target range
Coverage is moderate, with 9 analysts publishing ratings: 5 Buy, 5 Hold, and 1 Sell, yielding a consensus recommendation of "buy" (mean score 2.45 on a 1-to-5 scale where lower is more bullish). The average target price of $404.11 implies roughly 10.0% upside from the current $367.22, a modest but positive expected return that is consistent with a fairly valued quality compounder rather than a mispriced opportunity. Sentiment leans cautiously bullish but is not conviction-driven — the Buy/Hold split is nearly even, and recent institutional actions have been reiterations rather than upgrades (Barclays Overweight on October 26 and October 6, Tigress Financial Buy on July 31, Roth Capital Buy on July 24, Baird Neutral in April).
The target range of $340.00 to $485.00 is wide — a 42.6% spread from low to high — signaling genuine disagreement about the growth trajectory. The $485 high target implies a re-rating toward 22x forward EPS of roughly $22, requiring either a revenue inflection in tools and commercial/industrial or multiple expansion on the back of margin recovery; the $340 low target implies continued earnings erosion and a de-rating toward 15x-16x, essentially pricing in a prolonged replacement-cycle downturn. With the low target only about 7.4% below the current price and the high target 32.1% above, the risk/reward skews favorably, but the absence of recent upgrades and the Q3 estimate miss suggest the consensus average is more likely to drift lower than higher until order trends stabilize.
Drowning in data?
Find the real signal!
Bulls vs Bears: SNA Investment Factors
The bear case currently has the stronger near-term evidence: revenue is down 0.74% year over year, operating margin has compressed 220 basis points to 24.7%, EPS has turned negative at $4.71 versus $5.01, and the Q3 print missed on both lines. The bull case is built on quality and balance sheet rather than momentum — a 5.5% FCF yield, 0.224 debt-to-equity, 52.4% gross margin, and a 17.65x forward multiple that is undemanding for the franchise. The single most important tension is whether this is a cyclical tools-replacement air pocket or structural pressure on technician spending: if revenue inflects, the multiple and margins re-rate toward the $485 high target, but if the stall persists, operating deleverage grinds EPS lower toward the $340 low target. With the stock at $367.22, roughly mid-range and 7.4% above the bear target versus 32.1% below the bull target, the setup favors patience over urgency — quality protects the downside, but there is no catalyst yet to force the upside.
Bullish
- Fortress balance sheet, self-funding model: Debt-to-equity of just 0.224, a current ratio of 4.79, and $1.67 billion of cash give Snap-on essentially no financial risk. Trailing free cash flow of $1.012 billion against an $18.3 billion market cap is a 5.5% FCF yield, and quarterly FCF of $223.0 million comfortably covered $126.1 million of dividends plus $87.1 million of buybacks.
- Elite margins with pricing power: Q3 gross margin held at 52.4% (versus 52.2% a year earlier) and net margin was 19.7%, exceptional for an industrial manufacturer. The 17.1% ROE and 9.7% ROA confirm the franchise earns well above its cost of capital even in a soft demand environment.
- Valuation discount to quality: At 17.98x trailing and 17.65x forward earnings, with EV/EBITDA of 12.11x and price-to-sales of 3.55x, Snap-on trades at a discount to what a 52%-gross-margin, brand-moated franchise typically commands. The 2.53% dividend yield with a conservative 45.5% payout ratio adds a valuation floor.
- Favorable risk/reward skew in targets: The analyst low target of $340 is only about 7.4% below the current $367.22, while the $485 high target is 32.1% above, and the $404.11 average implies roughly 10.0% upside. With a beta of 0.746 and a max drawdown of only -15.19%, downside participation is structurally limited.
Bearish
- Revenue has stalled outright: Q3 revenue of $1.282 billion was down 0.74% year over year, and the trailing four-quarter run rate of roughly $5.06 billion shows no sequential acceleration. Consensus revenue of $5.26 billion implies only low-single-digit recovery, so the thesis no longer rests on growth.
- Operating margin compression is real: Operating income fell to $316.4 million (24.7% margin) from $347.4 million (26.9%) a year earlier, and EBITDA declined to $342.1 million from $386.5 million. The squeeze is operating-expense deleverage on flat-to-down revenue, not a gross-margin problem, meaning it persists until volume recovers.
- Earnings trajectory has turned negative: Q3 EPS of $4.71 (diluted $4.64) versus $5.01 a year ago confirms earnings are now declining, and the October 22 Q3 print missed both earnings and revenue estimates. The PEG ratio of -10.81 is a mechanical artifact of this negative near-term growth.
- Broad-based segment softness: Tools Group at $471.5 million, Repair Systems and Information at $454.7 million, and Commercial and Industrial at $404.3 million all show weakness, with the historically growth-driving tools franchise no longer offsetting industrial softness. This is a cyclical air pocket across the portfolio rather than a single fixable drag.
SNA Technical Analysis
Snap-on is in a medium-term downtrend within a longer-term range, with the stock at $367.22 sitting roughly 46.5% of the way through its 52-week range of $320.80 to $423.02 — closer to the midpoint than either extreme, which signals neither momentum leadership nor a distressed value setup. The 1-year change of +7.58% masks a deteriorating path: the stock peaked near $419 in late July and has since given back roughly 12%, and it remains about 13.2% below its 52-week high while holding 14.5% above its 52-week low. This positioning is characteristic of a range-bound consolidation that has rolled over at the top of the band rather than a clean uptrend.
Short-term momentum is mixed and diverging from the intermediate trend: the 1-month change of +2.04% and year-to-date gain of +4.64% contrast sharply with the 3-month decline of -11.80% and 6-month change of -1.81%. That divergence — a stabilizing month inside a falling quarter — looks more like a mean-reversion bounce after the October selloff to $355.62 than a confirmed trend reversal, especially since the bounce has stalled near $367. Relative strength tells the same story: SNA has outperformed the S&P 500 by 7.03 percentage points over the past month (versus SPY's -4.99%) but underperformed by 6.89 points over three months and 2.01 points over one year. Volume of roughly 327,600 shares is modest, and the elevated short ratio of 12.48 days suggests positioning is not crowded on either side.
Key technical levels are well defined: support sits at the 52-week low of $320.80, with an intermediate floor near the October low of $355.62, while resistance is the 52-week high of $423.02 and the July swing high around $419.31. A decisive break above $423 would signal a resumption of the uptrend and likely force short covering, whereas a loss of $355.62 would open the door to a retest of $320.80 and confirm the downtrend. With a beta of 0.746, Snap-on is roughly 25% less volatile than the market, which supports larger position sizing for a given risk budget but also means the stock will likely lag in strong risk-on rallies; the maximum drawdown of -15.19% over the period is consistent with a low-beta industrial compounder rather than a high-torque cyclical.
Beta
0.75
0.75x market volatility
Max Drawdown
-15.2%
Largest decline past year
52-Week Range
$321-$423
Price range past year
Annual Return
+9.2%
Cumulative gain past year
| Period | SNA Return | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1m | +3.5% | -2.4% |
| 3m | -7.4% | -2.3% |
| 6m | +4.2% | +2.8% |
| 1y | +9.2% | +11.3% |
| ytd | +6.8% | +11.4% |
Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner
Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions
SNA Fundamental Analysis
Revenue is stagnating rather than growing: the most recent quarter (ended October 3, 2026) delivered $1.282 billion, down 0.74% year over year from $1.292 billion, and the trailing four-quarter run rate of roughly $5.06 billion shows no sequential acceleration ($1.207B in Q1, $1.235B in Q2, $1.282B in Q3 versus $1.340B in the prior-year Q4). Segment data points to broad-based softness rather than a single drag — Tools Group at $471.5 million, Repair Systems and Information at $454.7 million, Commercial and Industrial at $404.3 million, and Financial Services at $98.6 million — with the tools franchise, historically the growth engine, no longer offsetting industrial weakness. The consensus revenue estimate of $5.26 billion implies only low-single-digit recovery, so the investment case currently rests on earnings durability and capital returns rather than top-line growth.
Profitability remains the franchise's strongest attribute: Q3 net income was $243.0 million on a 52.4% gross margin and a 24.7% operating margin, with a 19.7% net margin that is elite for an industrial manufacturer. Margins are, however, compressing at the operating line — operating income fell to $316.4 million (24.7% margin) from $347.4 million (26.9%) a year earlier, and EBITDA declined to $342.1 million from $386.5 million — even as gross margin held roughly flat at 52.4% versus 52.2%. The squeeze is coming from operating expense deleverage on flat-to-down revenue, and the Q3 earnings miss reported on October 22 confirms that cost discipline is not fully offsetting volume softness. EPS of $4.71 (diluted $4.64) versus $5.01 a year ago shows the earnings trajectory has turned negative, which is the central fundamental risk.
Financial health is exceptional: debt-to-equity of just 0.224, a current ratio of 4.79, cash of $1.67 billion, and trailing free cash flow of $1.012 billion against a market cap of $18.3 billion imply an FCF yield of roughly 5.5%. Quarterly free cash flow of $223.0 million comfortably funded $126.1 million of dividends and $87.1 million of buybacks, and ROE of 17.1% and ROA of 9.7% remain well above cost of capital. The company is self-funding, returns essentially all excess cash to shareholders (payout ratio 45.5%), and carries negligible financial risk — the balance sheet is a source of downside protection, not a constraint on growth.
Quarterly Revenue
$1.3B
2026-10
Revenue YoY Growth
-0.7%
YoY Comparison
Gross Margin
52.4%
Latest Quarter
Free Cash Flow
$1.0B
Last 12 Months
Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)
Revenue Breakdown
Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!
Valuation Analysis: Is SNA Overvalued?
Because Snap-on is solidly profitable (Q3 net income of $243.0 million), the PE ratio is the appropriate primary metric. The stock trades at 17.98x trailing earnings and 17.65x forward earnings — a narrow gap that implies the market expects essentially flat-to-modest EPS growth, consistent with the consensus estimate of $21.78 for the forward period. The PEG ratio of -10.81 is a mechanical artifact of negative near-term earnings growth and should be disregarded; the more telling signal is that a 17.7x forward multiple on a business with 19.7% net margins and 17.1% ROE is undemanding in absolute terms.
Relative to the broader industrial tools and accessories peer set, Snap-on screens at a discount on most measures: a price-to-sales ratio of 3.55x, price-to-book of 3.08x, and EV/EBITDA of 12.11x are modest for a franchise with 52% gross margins and a dominant brand. The 2.53% dividend yield and 45.5% payout ratio further support the value case, and the 5.5% FCF yield provides a valuation floor. The discount appears partly justified by the negative revenue growth and margin compression, but the quality of the franchise — pricing power, recurring financial services income, and a fortress balance sheet — argues the market is over-penalizing a cyclical air pocket.
Historically, Snap-on's PE has ranged from roughly 12x to 20x over the past several years, with the trailing multiple now at 17.98x versus 19.58x in the prior quarter and 16.76x a year ago — near the middle-to-upper portion of its own band. The price-to-sales ratio of 3.55x compares with a historical range of roughly 2.4x to 3.4x, placing it near the top of its own PS band despite flat revenue, which suggests the market is still pricing in recovery rather than deterioration. Net-net, the stock is cheap versus its quality but not versus its own history — a setup that favors patience over urgency until revenue inflects.
PE
18.0x
Latest Quarter
vs. Historical
High-End
5-Year PE Range 11x~20x
vs. Industry Avg
23.5x
Industry PE ~23.5x*
EV/EBITDA
12.1x
Enterprise Value Multiple
Investment Risk Disclosure
Financial and operational risks center on earnings erosion rather than solvency. Operating income fell to $316.4 million (24.7% margin) from $347.4 million (26.9%) a year earlier and EBITDA dropped to $342.1 million from $386.5 million, so every quarter of flat revenue now translates directly into profit decline through operating-expense deleverage. Q3 EPS of $4.71 versus $5.01 a year ago shows the negative trajectory is already in the numbers, and with revenue concentrated across four segments — Tools at $471.5 million, Repair Systems at $454.7 million, Commercial and Industrial at $404.3 million, and Financial Services at $98.6 million — broad-based softness leaves no offset. The mitigating factor is a fortress balance sheet: debt-to-equity of 0.224, a current ratio of 4.79, $1.67 billion of cash, and $1.012 billion of trailing free cash flow mean the dividend and buyback are not at risk even in a prolonged downturn.
Market and competitive risks are primarily valuation and sentiment driven. At 17.98x trailing and 17.65x forward earnings the stock sits in the middle-to-upper portion of its historical 12x-20x band, and its price-to-sales of 3.55x is near the top of its own 2.4x-3.4x historical range despite flat revenue — meaning the market is still pricing recovery, and any further estimate cuts would compress the multiple. The stock has underperformed the S&P 500 by 6.89 percentage points over three months and 2.01 points over one year, and the October 22 Q3 miss (reported by Zacks) reinforces the risk of downward estimate revisions. With a beta of 0.746 the stock is roughly 25% less volatile than the market, which cushions macro shocks but also means it will lag in risk-on rotations; the 12.48-day short ratio suggests positioning is not crowded, so there is no squeeze dynamic to rescue the price.
Worst-case scenario: the tools-replacement air pocket proves structural, technician spending stays depressed, and operating deleverage compounds across several quarters, driving forward EPS below the $20.68 low estimate and forcing a de-rating toward 15x-16x. That path aligns with the analyst low target of $340, about 7.4% below the current $367.22, and a break of the October low of $355.62 would open a retest of the 52-week low of $320.80 — roughly -12.6% from here. A full retest of the 52-week low combined with estimate cuts would represent a realistic downside of about -13%, consistent with the -15.19% maximum drawdown already observed; a deeper bear outcome toward $300 would require both an earnings miss cycle and multiple compression below the historical floor.
FAQ
Ranked by severity, the first risk is earnings erosion through operating deleverage: operating income fell to $316.4 million (24.7% margin) from $347.4 million (26.9%) a year earlier and EBITDA dropped to $342.1 million from $386.5 million, so flat revenue now converts directly into profit decline. Second is the risk that the revenue stall is structural rather than cyclical — Q3 revenue of $1.282 billion was down 0.74% year over year with softness across Tools ($471.5 million), Repair Systems ($454.7 million), and Commercial and Industrial ($404.3 million), leaving no offset. Third is estimate-revision and multiple-compression risk after the October 22 Q3 miss, which could pull the $404.11 consensus average lower and de-rate the stock toward 15x-16x, consistent with the $340 low target. Fourth, and least severe given the balance sheet, is macro and sector-rotation sensitivity: a 0.746 beta cushions shocks but means SNA lags in risk-on rallies, and it has already underperformed the S&P 500 by 6.89 points over three months.
The scenario framework assigns a 55% probability to the base case of $385-$415, in which revenue stabilizes near the $5.26 billion consensus, gross margin holds around 52%, operating margin steadies at 24%-25%, and EPS tracks toward $21.78, landing the stock near the $404.11 analyst average. The 25% bear case targets $320-$345, assuming the revenue stall proves structural, forward EPS falls below the $20.68 low estimate, and the multiple de-rates to 15x-16x, aligning with the $340 low target and opening a retest of the $320.80 52-week low. The 20% bull case targets $450-$485, requiring revenue to inflect toward the $5.36 billion high estimate, operating margin to recover above 26%, and EPS to approach $24.06 at 19x-20x forward earnings, consistent with the $485 high target. The base case is most likely, and its key assumption is that the current tools-replacement air pocket is cyclical and margins hold rather than compress further.
The answer depends on the benchmark. At 17.98x trailing and 17.65x forward earnings, 12.11x EV/EBITDA, 3.55x price-to-sales, and 3.08x price-to-book, Snap-on looks inexpensive for a business earning a 52.4% gross margin, 19.7% net margin, and 17.1% ROE — a quality discount rather than a value trap signal. Against its own history, however, the picture is less generous: the trailing multiple sits in the middle-to-upper portion of its roughly 12x-20x band (versus 19.58x last quarter and 16.76x a year ago), and the 3.55x PS ratio is near the top of its own 2.4x-3.4x range despite flat revenue. The market is therefore paying a fair-to-full price versus history while pricing in a recovery that has not yet appeared; the PEG ratio of -10.81 is a mechanical artifact of negative growth and should be ignored. Net verdict: cheap versus quality, fairly valued versus its own record.
From a risk/reward standpoint the setup is modestly favorable but not compelling: at $367.22 the stock sits about 7.4% above the $340 analyst low target while the $485 high target is 32.1% above, and the $404.11 average implies roughly 10.0% upside. The downside is cushioned by a 0.746 beta, a -15.19% maximum drawdown, a 2.53% dividend yield on a conservative 45.5% payout ratio, and a 5.5% FCF yield on $1.012 billion of trailing free cash flow. The offset is that the fundamental momentum is negative — revenue fell 0.74% year over year, Q3 EPS of $4.71 came in below $5.01 a year earlier, and the October 22 print missed both lines. It is a good buy for patient, income-oriented investors willing to scale in on weakness toward the $340-$355 area, but not an urgent buy at the current mid-range price given the absence of a revenue catalyst.
Snap-on is structurally a long-term holding rather than a trading vehicle. It is a mature, low-beta (0.746) industrial compounder with 13,000 employees, a 1972 listing history, a 2.53% dividend yield at a 45.5% payout ratio, and $1.012 billion of trailing free cash flow that funds both the dividend and buybacks — a profile built for multi-year ownership, not momentum. The near-term setup argues against short-term entry: the stock is down 11.80% over three months, has underperformed the S&P 500 by 6.89 points over that span, and the October 22 Q3 miss leaves estimate revisions pointed downward, so a trader would be fighting both trend and sentiment. Earnings visibility is decent but not high given the flat revenue trajectory, which limits the case for aggressive position sizing. A suggested minimum holding period is two to three years, with entry preferably staged on weakness toward the $340-$355 support zone rather than at the current mid-range $367.22.