Landstar System
LSTR
$171.65
-0.47%
Landstar System is an asset-light, agent-based third-party logistics provider focused primarily on domestic truck brokerage, supplemented by intermodal, global air and ocean forwarding, and warehousing services, operating within the Industrials sector's Integrated Freight & Logistics industry. The company is distinct for its unique agent and leased owner-operator network model, which pairs roughly half of its truck freight hauled by leased owner-operators with the remainder handled by third-party broker-carriers, and it also runs a small captive insurance program for owner-operators — a structure that has historically delivered industry-leading operating profitability without heavy capital intensity. The current investor narrative centers on a freight-cycle recovery debate: after a prolonged truckload rate downturn that compressed margins and earnings, the most recent quarter showed revenue returning to modest year-over-year growth alongside a sharp sequential margin rebound, fueling hopes that the cycle has bottomed. That optimism is tempered by a sharp three-month share-price pullback and a cautious analyst community, with several firms recently trimming ratings (Morgan Stanley moved to Underweight in July) as investors weigh whether the recovery is durable or merely a seasonal head fake.…
LSTR
Landstar System
$171.65
People also watch
United Parcel Service
UPS
FedEx
FDX
Expeditors International
EXPD
J. B. Hunt
JBHT
C. H. Robinson Worldwide
CHRW
Investment Opinion: Should I buy LSTR Today?
Rating: Hold. The core thesis is that Landstar is a high-quality asset-light logistics franchise with a fortress balance sheet, but the current valuation already reflects a freight-cycle recovery that is only one quarter old and not yet confirmed. The analyst consensus rating of 2.78 (Hold) and average target of $187.69 (9.3% upside) suggest fair value with limited near-term catalyst.
Supporting evidence: The forward PE of 22.4x is reasonable if earnings double to $8.76, but the trailing PE of 44.1x is expensive. Revenue growth of 1.31% YoY is modest, and gross margin of 22.56% remains below the 2024 peak of ~20%? Actually 2024 gross margins were around 20%, so 22.56% is above, but operating margin of 4.55% is below the 5-6% levels of 2024. Free cash flow of $233.6 million provides flexibility, and the 2.46% dividend yield is attractive. However, the stock trades at 6.37x book and 24.3x EV/EBITDA, a premium to historical averages.
Risks: The biggest risks are a delay in freight-rate recovery, margin volatility, and a potential dividend cut if earnings remain depressed. The rating would upgrade to Buy if the stock pulls back toward $145–$150 (analyst low) or if forward EPS estimates rise above $9.50 with evidence of sustained margin expansion. It would downgrade to Sell if revenue growth turns negative again or if gross margins fall below 15% for two consecutive quarters. Relative to history and peers, the stock appears fairly valued to slightly overvalued on trailing metrics, but fairly valued on forward earnings.
Sign up to view all
LSTR 12-Month Price Forecast
Landstar presents a balanced risk/reward at current levels. The company's asset-light model and strong balance sheet provide downside support, but the stock's valuation already discounts a freight recovery that has yet to be proven. The Q1 margin rebound is encouraging but could be seasonal, and revenue growth remains anemic. Analyst sentiment is cautious, with a recent downgrade and a wide target range indicating low conviction. I would upgrade to bullish if we see two consecutive quarters of revenue growth above 3% and operating margins above 5%, or if the stock pulls back to the $145–$150 range. I would downgrade to bearish if gross margins fall below 15% or if the dividend is cut.
Wall Street consensus
Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on Landstar System's 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $187.69 and implied upside of +9.3% versus the current price.
Average Target
$187.69
0 analysts
Implied Upside
+9.3%
vs. current price
Analyst Count
—
covering this stock
Price Range
$145 - $225
Analyst target range
Coverage is solid with 16 analysts, but sentiment is decidedly cautious: the consensus recommendation is "hold" with a mean rating of 2.78 (where 1 is strong buy and 5 is strong sell), and the average target price of $187.69 implies roughly +9.3% upside from the current $171.65. That is a modest, market-like expected return rather than a conviction call, and the recent ratings flow reinforces the neutral-to-bearish tilt — Morgan Stanley downgraded to Underweight from Equal Weight on July 6, 2026, while Susquehanna, Stifel, Evercore, Barclays, and TD Cowen all sit at Neutral/Hold/In Line, with only Baird (Outperform) and Wells Fargo (Overweight) on the bullish side. The consensus clearly leans neutral, reflecting uncertainty over the durability of the freight recovery.
The target range of $145 to $225 is wide — a spread of $80, or roughly 47% of the current price — signaling high dispersion and low conviction among analysts. The $225 high target (about 31% above the current price) likely assumes a full truckload rate recovery, margin expansion back toward mid-cycle levels, and multiple support from forward EPS near the $9.51 high estimate; the $145 low target (about 16% below current) prices in a stalled recovery, continued margin compression, and earnings landing near the $7.97 low estimate. The wide spread, combined with the cluster of Hold ratings and a fresh downgrade, suggests the stock is fairly valued to slightly undervalued on consensus but lacks a near-term catalyst strong enough to close the gap to the high end — investors should expect range-bound trading until freight fundamentals provide clearer direction.
Drowning in data?
Find the real signal!
Bulls vs Bears: LSTR Investment Factors
The bull case rests on a nascent freight-cycle recovery, evidenced by Q1 2026 revenue growth and a sharp margin rebound, backed by a pristine balance sheet and strong free cash flow. However, the bear case is equally compelling: valuation is stretched on trailing metrics, margins remain volatile and below prior peaks, and analyst sentiment is cautious with a recent downgrade. Currently, the bear evidence appears slightly stronger because the recovery is only one quarter old, revenue growth is tepid at 1.31%, and the stock's technical trend is negative. The single most important tension is whether the Q1 margin snapback is a genuine inflection in truckload rates or merely seasonal/insurance-related noise; if rates fail to inflect, the forward earnings expectations embedded in the 22.4x PE will likely be revised down, pressuring the stock.
Bullish
- Q1 margin snapback signals cycle bottom: Gross margin jumped to 22.56% in Q1 2026 from 13.24% in Q4 2025, driving net income to $39.44 million (EPS $1.16) versus $23.94 million in the prior quarter. This sharp sequential recovery suggests the freight-rate trough may have passed, and if sustained, could restore earnings toward prior-cycle levels.
- Revenue returned to growth: After four consecutive quarters of year-over-year declines, revenue grew 1.31% YoY to $1.171 billion in Q1 2026, ending a string of contractions from $1.215 billion in Q2 2025 to $1.174 billion in Q4 2025. While modest, the inflection supports the thesis that the freight cycle is stabilizing.
- Fortress balance sheet with ample liquidity: Debt-to-equity is just 0.168, the current ratio is 1.75, and TTM free cash flow of $233.6 million covers the 2.46% dividend yield and buybacks comfortably. Interest expense of only $518,000 against $53.2 million operating income means financial risk is negligible, providing downside protection.
- Analyst target implies upside: The average analyst target price of $187.69 represents a 9.3% upside from the current $171.65, with the high target of $225 implying 31% upside. Although the consensus rating is 'hold,' the target range suggests most analysts see limited downside and potential for recovery.
Bearish
- Extreme margin volatility and thin profitability: Gross margin has swung from 20.02% in Q2 2025 to 13.17% in Q3 2025 to 22.56% in Q1 2026, highlighting the cyclical and seasonal nature of the business. The trailing net margin of 2.42% and operating margin of 3.58% are thin, leaving little buffer if rates decline again.
- Valuation leaves little room for error: The trailing PE of 44.1x is near the top of its multi-year range (11.5x–36.5x historically), and EV/EBITDA of 24.3x is elevated. The forward PE of 22.4x already prices a full recovery, so any delay in rate improvement could trigger multiple compression.
- Cautious analyst sentiment and downgrades: The consensus recommendation is 'hold' with a mean rating of 2.78, and Morgan Stanley downgraded to Underweight in July 2026. The wide target range of $145–$225 (47% spread) signals low conviction and uncertainty about the durability of the recovery.
- Technical downtrend and momentum breakdown: The stock is down 18.86% over three months, underperforming the S&P 500 by 21.55 percentage points, and sits at only 47% of its 52-week range. The 27.33% max drawdown from the June high of $228.46 indicates a broken uptrend and potential for further weakness.
LSTR Technical Analysis
Landstar is in a medium-term downtrend embedded within a longer-term recovery: the stock is up 31.19% over the past year but sits at $171.65, which is only about 47% of its 52-week range of $121.12 to $228.46, having surrendered a large portion of the gains that carried it to the high in late June. The 1-year relative strength of +15.66 percentage points versus the S&P 500 confirms genuine outperformance over twelve months, but the current position in the lower half of the range signals that momentum has broken and the stock is searching for a base rather than pressing highs. The 27.33% max drawdown underscores how violently the trend reversed from its peak.
Short-term momentum is stabilizing but not yet repaired: the stock is up 1.48% over the past month versus a 1.22% gain for SPY (relative strength +0.26), a modest outperformance that contrasts starkly with the -18.86% three-month change and a -21.55 percentage-point relative-strength gap versus the index over that window. This divergence — a positive one-month print against a deeply negative three-month trend — is consistent with a mean-reversion bounce off oversold conditions rather than a confirmed trend reversal, particularly since the six-month change of -0.71% shows the stock has essentially round-tripped. Volume of roughly 696,000 shares and a short ratio of 4.88 days suggest moderate but not extreme bearish positioning, leaving room for either a squeeze or further distribution.
Key technical levels are well defined: support sits at the 52-week low of $121.12, with intermediate support around the $163–$165 area where the stock bottomed in late September, while resistance is anchored at the $228.46 52-week high, with the $200–$210 zone (the July breakdown level) acting as the first major hurdle. A breakout above $200 would signal the downtrend has been broken and refocus the market on the highs, whereas a breakdown below $163 would confirm the bearish trend and open the door toward the $121 low. With a beta of 0.893, Landstar is roughly 11% less volatile than the market, meaning position sizing can be somewhat larger for equivalent risk, but the 27.33% drawdown demonstrates that low beta has not insulated holders from severe sector-specific de-rating.
Beta
0.89
0.89x market volatility
Max Drawdown
-27.3%
Largest decline past year
52-Week Range
$121-$228
Price range past year
Annual Return
+31.2%
Cumulative gain past year
| Period | LSTR Return | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1m | +1.5% | +0.2% |
| 3m | -18.9% | +2.9% |
| 6m | -0.7% | +8.4% |
| 1y | +31.2% | +14.9% |
| ytd | +16.9% | +11.9% |
Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner
Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions
LSTR Fundamental Analysis
Revenue is showing early signs of a cyclical turn: the most recent quarter (ended 2026-03-28) delivered $1.171 billion in revenue, up 1.31% year-over-year, ending a string of declines that saw revenue fall from $1.215 billion in Q2 2025 to $1.205 billion in Q3 2025 and $1.174 billion in Q4 2025. The sequential trend is essentially flat — $1.174B (Q4) to $1.171B (Q1) — indicating stabilization rather than acceleration, and the segment mix shows Transportation Logistics at $1.157 billion dwarfing the $25.6 million Insurance segment, so the investment case remains almost entirely a truck-brokerage volume and rate story. With consensus revenue estimates of $6.86 billion for the forward year, the market is pricing a modest recovery, but the tepid 1.3% growth print suggests the inflection is shallow and highly dependent on spot truckload rates inflecting.
Profitability rebounded sharply but remains well below prior-cycle peaks: Q1 2026 net income was $39.44 million (EPS $1.16) on a 22.56% gross margin, a dramatic improvement from Q4 2025's $23.94 million and 13.24% gross margin, though still below the $41.89 million earned in Q2 2025 at a 20.02% gross margin. The quarterly gross-margin path — 20.02% (Q2 2025) → 13.17% (Q3 2025) → 13.24% (Q4 2025) → 22.56% (Q1 2026) — reveals extreme seasonality and volatility, with the Q4 trough reflecting weak peak-season pricing; the trailing net margin of 2.42% and operating margin of 3.58% are thin even by asset-light brokerage standards, where mid-single-digit operating margins are typical in normalized markets. The key question is whether the Q1 margin snapback reflects genuine rate recovery or favorable insurance/claims timing, since a 13% gross margin in Q4 is dangerously close to breakeven for this model.
Financial health is a clear strength: debt-to-equity is just 0.168, the current ratio is a healthy 1.75, and TTM free cash flow of $233.6 million represents roughly 4.6% of the $5.07 billion market cap, comfortably funding the 2.46% dividend yield and buybacks (Q1 2026 alone saw $81.7 million in dividends paid and $22.4 million in repurchases). ROE of 14.45% and ROA of 7.33% are respectable for an asset-light model, and interest coverage is enormous (interest expense of just $518,000 against $53.2 million operating income), meaning the balance sheet poses essentially no financial risk. The caveat is the payout ratio of 108%, which exceeds earnings and signals the dividend is being funded from cash flow rather than net income — sustainable given FCF but a reminder that earnings are cyclically depressed.
Quarterly Revenue
$1.2B
2026-03
Revenue YoY Growth
+1.3%
YoY Comparison
Gross Margin
22.6%
Latest Quarter
Free Cash Flow
$233603000.0B
Last 12 Months
Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)
Revenue Breakdown
Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!
Valuation Analysis: Is LSTR Overvalued?
Because Landstar is profitable (net income of $39.44 million in the latest quarter and positive TTM earnings), the PE ratio is the appropriate primary metric: the trailing PE of 44.1x looks extreme, but the forward PE of 22.4x tells the real story — the market expects earnings to roughly double, consistent with consensus EPS of $8.76 versus the depressed trailing figure. That 44.1x-to-22.4x gap implies investors are pricing a full freight-cycle recovery, and the stock is expensive on trailing numbers precisely because trailing earnings sit near a cyclical trough. The PEG ratio of -1.10 is not meaningful given negative near-term growth comparisons and should be disregarded.
Relative to its own sector, Landstar screens expensive on earnings but cheap on sales: the PS ratio of 1.07x and EV/Sales of 1.13x are low in absolute terms for an asset-light logistics platform, while the EV/EBITDA of 24.3x and P/B of 6.37x reflect the capital-light model and trough EBITDA. The 13.1% gross margin and 3.6% operating margin are structurally lower than asset-heavy peers but typical for pure brokerage, so the premium P/B is justified by returns on minimal invested capital rather than asset backing. On a forward basis, the 22.4x PE for a business with mid-single-digit long-term growth and cyclical earnings is a premium that requires the recovery thesis to hold.
Historical context is instructive: Landstar's PE ranged from roughly 11.5x–16.7x during the 2021–2022 freight boom (when earnings were peak), 20.6x–36.5x through 2023–2024, and has expanded to 44.1x trailing today — near the top of its multi-year band, though the forward multiple of 22.4x sits closer to the middle. The PS ratio of 1.07x, by contrast, is near the bottom of its historical range (which ran 2.7x–5.9x in 2021–2024), highlighting the divergence between depressed revenue and depressed earnings. The market is thus pricing a margin-recovery story: if margins normalize toward the 5–7% operating levels of 2021–2023, the current multiple compresses quickly, but if the cycle stalls, the trailing 44x PE leaves little valuation cushion.
PE
44.1x
Latest Quarter
vs. Historical
High-End
5-Year PE Range 11x~55x
vs. Industry Avg
N/A
Industry PE ~N/A*
EV/EBITDA
24.3x
Enterprise Value Multiple
Investment Risk Disclosure
Financial and operational risks center on the company's thin margins and cyclical earnings. The trailing net margin of 2.42% and operating margin of 3.58% leave little cushion, and gross margin has ranged from 13.17% to 22.56% over the past four quarters, demonstrating extreme volatility. The payout ratio of 108% exceeds earnings, meaning the dividend relies on free cash flow of $233.6 million; a prolonged downturn could force a dividend cut or reduce buybacks. Additionally, revenue is heavily concentrated in Transportation Logistics ($1.157 billion of $1.171 billion), making the company highly sensitive to truckload volumes and rates.
Market and competitive risks include valuation compression and sector rotation. The trailing PE of 44.1x is near the high end of its historical range, and EV/EBITDA of 24.3x is elevated; if the freight recovery disappoints, multiple contraction could be severe. The beta of 0.893 indicates lower market correlation, but the 27.33% max drawdown shows sector-specific de-rating can be brutal. Competition from digital freight brokers and asset-heavy carriers could pressure margins, and regulatory changes in trucking (e.g., emissions rules) may raise costs for the owner-operator network.
Worst-case scenario: a stalled freight recovery leads to revenue declines and margin compression back to Q4 2025 levels (13.24% gross margin), causing earnings to miss the $8.76 consensus EPS. Analysts could downgrade further, pushing the stock toward the low target of $145 (16% downside) or the 52-week low of $121.12 (29% downside). From the current $171.65, a drop to $121.12 would represent a 29.4% loss, consistent with the recent max drawdown of 27.33%.
FAQ
The key risks include: 1) Cyclical earnings risk—gross margin has ranged from 13.17% to 22.56% in the past four quarters, and a downturn could compress margins again. 2) Valuation risk—the trailing PE of 44.1x leaves room for multiple compression if recovery stalls. 3) Dividend risk—the payout ratio of 108% exceeds earnings, and a prolonged downturn could force a cut. 4) Competitive risk—digital freight brokers and asset-heavy carriers could pressure pricing. The most severe is a freight recession, which could drive the stock to the 52-week low of $121.12, a 29% decline.
Our 12-month forecast has three scenarios: Bull (25% probability) target $210–$225, Base (55%) target $175–$195, and Bear (20%) target $121–$145. The base case assumes gradual recovery with EPS meeting the $8.76 consensus and the stock trading near the analyst average target of $187.69. The most likely scenario is the base case, as it aligns with current analyst estimates and a stabilizing freight market. Key assumptions include flat to slightly positive truckload rates and sustained gross margins around 22%.
LSTR appears fairly valued on forward earnings but overvalued on trailing metrics. The forward PE of 22.4x is in line with historical mid-cycle levels, but the trailing PE of 44.1x is near the top of its multi-year range. The PS ratio of 1.07x is near the bottom of its historical range, suggesting the market is pricing depressed revenue. Overall, the valuation implies the market expects a full earnings recovery, leaving little margin for error if growth disappoints.
LSTR is a good buy only for investors with a medium-term horizon who believe the freight cycle is recovering. The stock trades at a forward PE of 22.4x, which is reasonable if earnings double to $8.76, but the trailing PE of 44.1x is expensive. The average analyst target of $187.69 implies 9.3% upside, which is modest. The biggest downside risk is a stalled recovery that could push the stock toward $145 or lower. Therefore, it is a good buy on pullbacks below $160 or with confirmation of sustained margin expansion.
LSTR is more suitable for medium-to-long-term investment (at least 1-2 years) given its cyclical nature and the need for the freight cycle to recover. The beta of 0.893 indicates lower volatility than the market, but the 27.33% max drawdown shows it is not immune to sharp declines. The dividend yield of 2.46% provides some income while waiting. Short-term trading is risky due to the lack of near-term catalysts and the recent downtrend. A minimum holding period of 12-18 months is recommended to ride out the cycle.