Mattel
MAT
$15.29
-1.55%
Mattel, Inc. designs, manufactures, and markets toys and family entertainment products sold through wholesale partners and direct-to-retail channels, with a portfolio anchored by Barbie, Hot Wheels, Fisher-Price, Thomas & Friends, and American Girl, and roughly 60% of net sales generated in North America. As one of the two dominant global toy manufacturers alongside Hasbro, Mattel is a brand-IP owner and licensor rather than a pure commodity toymaker, giving it pricing power and entertainment-franchise optionality that smaller competitors lack. The current investor debate centers on whether Mattel can convert its intellectual property into durable, higher-margin growth after a volatile 2025-2026 stretch marked by a sharp Q2 2026 revenue acceleration (+10.5% YoY to $1.13 billion) that nonetheless produced a net loss of $18.2 million, alongside aggressive share repurchases and a heavily seasonal, working-capital-driven cash profile. Sentiment has been whipsawed by tariff and input-cost concerns, a Goldman Sachs downgrade to Sell in July 2026, and a violent October 2026 rally that lifted shares roughly 25% in a month, leaving investors to weigh turnaround momentum against still-thin trailing profitability.…
MAT
Mattel
$15.29
People also watch
Hasbro
HAS
Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.
LTH
Planet Fitness
PLNT
YETI
YETI
Peloton
PTON
Investment Opinion: Should I buy MAT Today?
Rating: Hold. The core thesis is that Mattel offers a cheap valuation (forward PE 10.39x, PS 1.18x) with a recovering top line (+10.48% YoY in Q2 2026), but profitability remains weak and uncertain, making risk/reward balanced. The analyst consensus is Buy with a mean rating of 1.93 and an average target of $18.46, implying 12.5% upside, but the wide target range of $11-$28 reflects deep disagreement.
Supporting evidence includes: 1) Forward PE of 10.39x versus mid-to-high-teens for branded toy peers; 2) Revenue growth of 10.48% YoY in Q2 2026, up from prior-year comparisons; 3) Gross margin of 48.87% and ROE of 17.81%, still respectable; 4) TTM free cash flow of $626.5 million, though seasonal; and 5) Implied upside of 12.5% to analyst average target. However, net margin of 7.44% and operating margin of 11.59% trail the 16.0% net margin from Q3 2025, and Q2 2026 produced a net loss.
The biggest risks are: 1) Continued gross-margin compression due to tariffs and input costs; 2) Failure of revenue acceleration to translate into profit; 3) Leverage with debt-to-equity of 1.20. The rating would upgrade to Buy if gross margins stabilize above 50% and net margin returns to high-single digits, or if the stock pulls back toward the $12.40 52-week low. It would downgrade to Sell if gross margins fall below 47% or if revenue growth decelerates below 5%. Relative to history and peers, the stock appears undervalued on sales and forward earnings, but the discount is justified by margin uncertainty.
Sign up to view all
MAT 12-Month Price Forecast
Mattel presents a balanced risk/reward profile: the stock is cheap on forward earnings and sales relative to its own history and peers, and revenue is re-accelerating, but profitability is weak and margin pressure persists. The analyst consensus is moderately bullish, but the wide target range and recent downgrades reflect genuine uncertainty. We would upgrade to bullish if gross margins stabilize above 50% and net income turns consistently positive, or if the stock pulls back to the $12.40 area providing a better entry point. We would downgrade to bearish if gross margins fall below 47% or if revenue growth stalls.
Wall Street consensus
Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on Mattel's 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $18.46 and implied upside of +20.7% versus the current price.
Average Target
$18.46
15 analysts
Implied Upside
+20.7%
vs. current price
Analyst Count
15
covering this stock
Price Range
$11 - $28
Analyst target range
Coverage is solid with 13 analysts, and the consensus recommendation is Buy (mean rating of 1.93 on a 1-to-5 scale where 1 is Strong Buy), with an average target price of $18.46. Against the current price of $16.41, that implies roughly +12.5% upside to consensus, a moderately bullish signal that nonetheless sits well below the stock's 52-week high of $22.48. The bullish tilt is notable given the stock's -14.44% one-year performance, suggesting analysts see the October rally as the start of a re-rating rather than a dead-cat bounce.
The target range is wide — $11.00 low to $28.00 high — a spread of more than 150% around the average, which signals high uncertainty and genuine disagreement about the margin trajectory. The $28.00 high target implies roughly 71% upside and would require multiple expansion toward the mid-teens forward PE plus successful margin recovery and brand momentum; the $11.00 low target implies about 33% downside and prices in continued gross-margin compression, tariff pressure, and a failure of the Q2 revenue acceleration to translate into profit. Recent institutional actions skew cautious — Goldman Sachs downgraded to Sell in July 2026, Citigroup moved from Buy to Neutral in February 2026, and JP Morgan has held Underweight — while Argus reiterated Buy in August 2026 and Wells Fargo remains Overweight, so the consensus Buy masks a bifurcated Street that is split between recovery believers and margin skeptics.
Drowning in data?
Find the real signal!
Bulls vs Bears: MAT Investment Factors
The bear case currently has stronger near-term evidence: Q2 2026 swung to a net loss of $18.2 million, gross margin compressed to 48.17% from 50.95%, and free cash flow was negative in both Q1 and Q2 2026. However, the bull case rests on valuation and recovery potential—PS of 1.18x is at the bottom of its historical range, forward PE of 10.39x is cheap versus peers, and revenue grew 10.48% YoY in Q2. The single most important tension is whether the Q2 revenue acceleration can translate into margin recovery; if gross margins stabilize near 50% and net margins return to high-single digits, the stock would look inexpensive, but persistent compression would justify the discount. Analyst consensus Buy with a $18.46 target suggests moderate optimism, but the wide $11-$28 range reflects deep uncertainty.
Bullish
- Deep valuation discount to history: PS ratio of 1.18x sits at the very bottom of the 3.1x-8.4x band seen over the past several years (e.g., 3.56x in Q2 2026, 8.43x in Q1 2024), and forward PE of 10.39x is well below the mid-to-high-teens multiples typical of branded toy peers. This suggests the market is pricing trough sentiment rather than a full recovery.
- Revenue re-acceleration in Q2 2026: Q2 2026 revenue grew 10.48% YoY to $1.125 billion, up from $1.019 billion in Q2 2025, marking a clear improvement from the prior-year comparison. Q1 2026 revenue also rose to $862.2 million from $826.6 million, indicating the top line is growing again.
- Analyst consensus Buy with upside: 13 analysts have a mean rating of 1.93 (Buy) and an average target price of $18.46, implying roughly 12.5% upside from the current $16.41. The bullish tilt persists despite the stock's -14.44% one-year performance, suggesting analysts see the October rally as the start of a re-rating.
- Strong brand IP and pricing power: Mattel owns Barbie, Hot Wheels, Fisher-Price, Thomas & Friends, and American Girl, giving it pricing power and entertainment-franchise optionality that smaller competitors lack. This IP portfolio supports a 48.87% gross margin and 17.81% ROE, both respectable for the industry.
Bearish
- Profitability collapse in Q2 2026: Q2 2026 produced a net loss of $18.2 million (-1.62% net margin) and EPS of -$0.06, a sharp reversal from Q2 2025's $53.4 million profit. Operating income collapsed to $10.9 million from $78.5 million, driven by gross margin compression to 48.17% from 50.95%.
- Margin compression trend: Gross margin has trended down from 50.01% in Q3 2025 to 48.17% in Q2 2026, consistent with tariff and input-cost pressure. The trailing net margin of 7.44% and operating margin of 11.59% remain well below the 16.0% net margin posted in Q3 2025.
- Seasonal cash burn and buyback reliance: Q2 2026 free cash flow was -$48.0 million and Q1 2026 was -$88.1 million, versus +$739.5 million in Q4 2025, reflecting working-capital swings. The company repurchased $200 million of stock in Q2 2026 even while burning operating cash of -$113.2 million, relying on financial flexibility rather than raw cash generation.
- Split analyst sentiment and downgrades: Goldman Sachs downgraded to Sell in July 2026, Citigroup moved from Buy to Neutral in February 2026, and JP Morgan has held Underweight, even as Argus reiterated Buy and Wells Fargo remains Overweight. The wide target range of $11 to $28 signals genuine disagreement about the margin trajectory.
MAT Technical Analysis
Mattel is in a recovery phase within a broader one-year downtrend: the stock is down 14.44% over the trailing year and 18.11% year-to-date, yet the current price of $16.41 sits at roughly 40% of its 52-week range of $12.40 to $22.48, having bounced hard off the low. That positioning is neither a clean momentum breakout nor a falling knife — it is a stock that has reclaimed meaningful ground but remains far below its highs, with a maximum drawdown of -42.87% over the period underscoring how deep the prior decline was. The 52-week high of $22.48 remains about 37% above the current price, so the longer-term trend has not been repaired even as short-term buyers have taken control.
Short-term momentum is decisively positive and sharply divergent from the annual trend: the stock is up 25.46% over the past month and 14.44% over three months, versus a 1-year decline of 14.44%, a classic mean-reversion rally off oversold conditions. Relative strength confirms the acceleration — +26.48 percentage points versus SPY over one month and +11.59 points over three months — even as the 1-year relative strength of -27.57 points shows how much ground was lost earlier. The move was punctuated by a gap from $12.66 on September 30 to $15.04 on October 1, followed by a steady climb to a $17.32 close on October 15 before a recent pullback to $16.41 on October 23 (-3.13% on the day), suggesting the rally is now consolidating rather than collapsing.
Key technical levels are well defined: support sits at the 52-week low of $12.40, with the September closing low of $12.66 as the nearer floor, while resistance lies at the $17.32 October swing high and then the $22.48 52-week high. A breakout above $17.32 on volume would signal that the October rally has legs and could open a path toward the mid-to-high teens, whereas a breakdown below $12.66 would invalidate the recovery and re-expose the stock to new lows. Volatility is a relative bright spot — beta of 0.702 means the stock is roughly 30% less volatile than the market, which supports position sizing but also implies the recent 25% monthly move was driven by idiosyncratic catalysts rather than broad market beta; the short ratio of 6.71 days-to-cover adds potential squeeze fuel on further upside.
Beta
0.59
0.59x market volatility
Max Drawdown
-42.9%
Largest decline past year
52-Week Range
$12-$22
Price range past year
Annual Return
-17.1%
Cumulative gain past year
| Period | MAT Return | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1m | +0.1% | -2.0% |
| 3m | +5.7% | -2.0% |
| 6m | +1.9% | +3.1% |
| 1y | -17.1% | +10.4% |
| ytd | -23.7% | +10.6% |
Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner
Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions
MAT Fundamental Analysis
Revenue is re-accelerating after a soft patch: Q2 2026 revenue of $1.1253 billion grew 10.48% year-over-year versus $1.0186 billion in Q2 2025, a marked improvement from the prior-year comparison, while Q1 2026 revenue of $862.2 million also rose versus $826.6 million in Q1 2025. The seasonal pattern remains pronounced — Q4 2025 revenue of $1.7665 billion and Q3 2025 revenue of $1.7360 billion dwarf the first half — and the international segment contributed $551.0 million, roughly half of Q2 sales, confirming a balanced geographic mix. The trajectory implies the top line is growing again, but the investment case hinges on whether the Q2 acceleration is a durable brand-driven recovery or a timing/restocking effect, especially with full-year consensus revenue of $6.62 billion implying modest growth.
Profitability is the weak link: Q2 2026 produced a net loss of $18.2 million (-1.62% net margin) and EPS of -$0.06, a sharp reversal from Q2 2025's $53.4 million profit, driven by gross margin compression to 48.17% from 50.95% and a collapse in operating income to $10.9 million from $78.5 million. Gross margin has trended down from 50.01% in Q3 2025 to 48.17% in Q2 2026, consistent with tariff and cost pressure, while the trailing net margin of 7.44% and operating margin of 11.59% remain below the 16.0% net margin posted in Q3 2025. The company is still solidly profitable on a trailing basis (trailing EPS of $0.06 is thin, but forward EPS of $1.98 is expected), so the current loss looks cyclical and seasonal rather than structural — but margin recovery is the key swing factor for the equity.
Balance-sheet health is adequate but leveraged: debt-to-equity stands at 1.20, the current ratio is a comfortable 2.15, and cash at the end of Q2 2026 was $1.108 billion, up from $866.0 million at the start of the quarter. Free cash flow is highly seasonal — TTM FCF is $626.5 million, but Q2 2026 FCF was -$48.0 million and Q1 2026 was -$88.1 million, versus +$739.5 million in Q4 2025 — reflecting working-capital swings, and the company repurchased $200 million of stock in Q2 2026 even while burning operating cash of -$113.2 million. ROE of 17.81% and ROA of 4.73% are respectable for the industry, but the reliance on buybacks and seasonal cash timing means financial flexibility, not raw cash generation, is what underpins the story.
Quarterly Revenue
$1.1B
2026-06
Revenue YoY Growth
+10.5%
YoY Comparison
Gross Margin
48.2%
Latest Quarter
Free Cash Flow
$626487000.0B
Last 12 Months
Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)
Revenue Breakdown
Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!
Valuation Analysis: Is MAT Overvalued?
Because trailing net income is positive but negligible (EPS of $0.063), the trailing PE of 15.87x is technically valid but distorted; the more informative metric is the forward PE of 10.39x, which reflects consensus EPS of $1.98 and implies the market expects earnings to roughly 30x from the current trailing base. The gap between trailing and forward multiples — 15.87x versus 10.39x — signals that the market is pricing a sharp earnings recovery, and the PEG ratio of -0.74 is not meaningful given the negative growth denominator. On sales, the PS ratio of 1.18x and EV/Sales of 1.26x are the cleanest cross-checks for a seasonal, IP-driven toymaker.
Against the broader leisure/consumer-cyclical peer set, Mattel screens cheap on forward earnings: a forward PE of 10.39x and EV/EBITDA of 10.02x are well below the mid-to-high-teens multiples typically commanded by branded toy and entertainment-IP peers, while the PS of 1.18x is a discount to the company's own historical norm. The discount is partly justified by the thin 7.44% net margin and 11.59% operating margin, which trail the 16.0% net margin achieved in Q3 2025, and by the Q2 2026 loss — but a 10x forward multiple for a company with 48.87% gross margins and 17.81% ROE suggests the market is skeptical of the recovery rather than fully pricing it.
Historically, Mattel's PS ratio has ranged from roughly 3.1x to 8.4x over the past several years (e.g., 3.56x in Q2 2026, 5.01x in Q1 2026, 3.44x in Q4 2025, and 8.43x back in Q1 2024), so the current 1.18x PS is at the very bottom of its own band — a level that historically coincided with trough sentiment rather than peak optimism. Similarly, the PB of 2.83x sits below the 3.0x-4.8x range seen through 2021-2024, and the trailing PE of 15.87x compares with 14.17x in Q4 2025 and single-digit multiples during the 2024 earnings peak. The read-through is that valuation embeds pessimism; if margins normalize toward the 50% gross-margin and high-single-digit net-margin levels of late 2025, the stock would look inexpensive, but persistent margin compression would justify the discount.
PE
15.9x
Latest Quarter
vs. Historical
Mid-Range
5-Year PE Range 2x~31x
vs. Industry Avg
21.8x
Industry PE ~21.8x*
EV/EBITDA
10.0x
Enterprise Value Multiple
Investment Risk Disclosure
Mattel's financial and operational risks are significant. The company swung to a net loss of $18.2 million in Q2 2026, with operating income collapsing to $10.9 million from $78.5 million a year earlier, and gross margin compressed to 48.17% from 50.95%. Free cash flow is highly seasonal and negative in the first half (Q1 2026: -$88.1 million; Q2 2026: -$48.0 million), while the company repurchased $200 million of stock in Q2 2026 despite burning operating cash of -$113.2 million, relying on balance-sheet flexibility. Debt-to-equity of 1.20 and a current ratio of 2.15 provide adequate but not ample cushion, and the thin trailing EPS of $0.063 means any margin miss could quickly erode profitability.
Market and competitive risks center on valuation compression and sector rotation. While forward PE of 10.39x is cheap versus peers, the discount is partly justified by thin margins (7.44% net, 11.59% operating) and the Q2 loss. Beta of 0.702 means the stock is less volatile than the market, but the recent 25.46% one-month rally was driven by idiosyncratic catalysts rather than broad beta, and a reversal could be sharp. Competitive pressure from Hasbro and smaller toymakers, along with tariff and input-cost headwinds, could keep margins under pressure. The Goldman Sachs downgrade to Sell in July 2026 and Citigroup's move to Neutral highlight emerging skepticism.
The worst-case scenario would involve a failure of the Q2 revenue acceleration to translate into profit, continued gross-margin compression, and a broader consumer slowdown. In this scenario, the stock could retest its 52-week low of $12.40, representing a decline of approximately 24.4% from the current price of $16.41. The analyst low target of $11.00 implies a 33% downside, pricing in persistent margin pressure and tariff headwinds. A break below the September closing low of $12.66 would invalidate the recovery and re-expose the stock to new lows, with the maximum drawdown over the past year already at -42.87%.
FAQ
The key risks are: 1) Financial: Q2 2026 net loss of $18.2 million and negative free cash flow in H1 2026, with debt-to-equity of 1.20; 2) Competitive: pressure from Hasbro and smaller toymakers, plus tariff and input-cost headwinds compressing gross margins; 3) Macro: consumer spending sensitivity and potential sector rotation, though beta of 0.702 is low; 4) Company-specific: failure of new product launches or a weak holiday season could trigger earnings misses and further analyst downgrades. The most severe risk is a prolonged margin compression leading to a retest of the $12.40 low.
Our 12-month forecast has three scenarios: Bull (25% probability) targeting $22.48-$28.00 if margins recover and revenue growth accelerates; Base (50% probability) targeting $17.32-$18.46 if current trends continue; Bear (25% probability) targeting $11.00-$12.40 if margin pressure persists. The base case is most likely, assuming revenue meets consensus of $6.62 billion and gross margins stabilize around 48-49%. The key assumption is that the Q2 revenue acceleration is durable and not a one-time restocking effect.
MAT appears undervalued on most metrics. The PS ratio of 1.18x is at the very bottom of its historical range of 3.1x-8.4x, and the forward PE of 10.39x is well below the mid-to-high-teens multiples of branded toy peers. The EV/EBITDA of 10.02x also screens cheap. However, the discount is partly justified by thin margins (7.44% net margin) and the recent quarterly loss. The market is pricing in skepticism about the recovery; if margins normalize, the stock could re-rate significantly, but if margin pressure persists, the discount may remain.
From a risk/reward perspective, MAT is a moderate buy for value-oriented investors. The stock trades at a forward PE of 10.39x and PS of 1.18x, well below historical norms, and analysts have a consensus Buy rating with an average target of $18.46, implying 12.5% upside. However, the company reported a net loss of $18.2 million in Q2 2026 and gross margins are compressing, so the biggest downside risk is a retest of the 52-week low of $12.40 (24% downside). It is a good buy for those who believe in the margin recovery story and can tolerate volatility, but conservative investors may want to wait for clearer signs of profitability improvement.
MAT is better suited for medium-to-long-term investment (at least 12-18 months) given its turnaround nature and seasonal earnings pattern. The stock's beta of 0.702 means lower volatility than the market, but the recent 25% one-month rally shows it can be driven by idiosyncratic catalysts. There is no dividend, so returns depend entirely on capital appreciation. Short-term trading could work around earnings announcements, but the wide analyst target range ($11-$28) and margin uncertainty make timing difficult. A minimum holding period of 12 months is suggested to allow for margin recovery to play out.