QXO

QXO, Inc.

$10.86

+2.07%
Oct 28, 2026
Bobby Quantitative Model
QXO, Inc. is a North American distributor of building products — roofing, insulation, wallboard, lumber, and related construction materials — operating in the roughly $800 billion building products distribution industry, and it has been radically transformed from a small software company into a scaled distribution platform through aggressive M&A. The company's identity is that of a serial consolidator and platform builder, led by CEO Brad Jacobs, whose playbook is to roll up a fragmented industry, layer technology on top, and pursue a stated target of nearly $50 billion in annual revenue within a decade. The current investor narrative is dominated by the transformative $17 billion acquisition of TopBuild, which dramatically expands QXO's scale and end-market exposure but has raised pointed questions about dilution, integration risk, and the path to profitability — themes echoed in recent coverage framing the deal as high-reward but execution-heavy. That debate, combined with a steep multi-quarter share-price decline and a still-unprofitable income statement, has made QXO a high-conviction battleground stock between bulls who underwrite the roll-up thesis and skeptics focused on cash burn and leverage.

People also watch

W. W. Grainger

W. W. Grainger

GWW

Analysis
Fastenal

Fastenal

FAST

Analysis
Ferguson Enterprises

Ferguson Enterprises

FERG

Analysis
WESCO International

WESCO International

WCC

Analysis
Watsco

Watsco

WSO

Analysis

QXO 12-Month Price Forecast

Historical Price
Current Price $10.86
Average Target $10.86
High Target $12.49
Low Target $9.23

Wall Street consensus

Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on QXO, Inc.'s 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $24.28 and implied upside of +123.5% versus the current price.

Average Target

$24.28

0 analysts

Implied Upside

+123.5%

vs. current price

Analyst Count

—

covering this stock

Price Range

$14 - $50

Analyst target range

Coverage is robust for a mid-cap: 19 analysts follow QXO, and the distribution is overwhelmingly positive with a consensus recommendation of "strong_buy" and a recommendation mean of 1.21 (where 1.0 is a strong buy). The average target price of $25.11 implies roughly +139% upside from the current $10.51 — an extraordinary gap that underscores how far the share price has decoupled from sell-side expectations. The consensus is unambiguously bullish, and the recent institutional ratings flow reinforces it: Citigroup (Buy), RBC Capital (Outperform), Keybanc (Overweight), Stephens & Co. (Overweight), Baird (Outperform), and Oppenheimer (Outperform) have all reiterated positive ratings between April and July 2026 with no downgrades in the provided data, suggesting analysts are treating the decline as a dislocation rather than a thesis break.

The target range of $14.00 to $50.00 is extremely wide — the high target is nearly 3.6 times the low — which signals very high uncertainty and divergent assumptions about the TopBuild integration. The $50 high target likely assumes successful integration, multiple expansion toward a scaled-distributor valuation, and delivery on the ~$50 billion revenue ambition, while the $14 low target (still +33% above the current price) prices in margin compression, dilution, and slower synergy realization. The fact that even the lowest target sits above the current price suggests the sell-side views the stock as oversold, but the 139% gap between price and average target, combined with a beta of 2.28 and a 6.22 short ratio, warns that the market is pricing risks — leverage, cash burn, and execution — that analysts may be underweighting; investors should treat the consensus as a directional signal of long-term value rather than a near-term price forecast.

Drowning in data?

Find the real signal!

Bulls vs Bears: QXO Investment Factors

The bear case currently has stronger near-term evidence: the stock is in an unbroken downtrend, cash flow is negative, and the company is unprofitable with negative interest coverage. The bull case rests on a longer-horizon bet — that the TopBuild integration lifts gross margins into the mid-20s, EBITDA scales toward the $31.86 billion consensus revenue base, and the 19.65x forward PE proves conservative rather than optimistic. The single most important tension is whether Q2's 24.74% gross margin is a durable integration milestone or a one-quarter artifact; if it holds through the next two prints, the forward earnings bridge becomes credible and the 139% analyst upside starts to look like dislocation rather than delusion. Until then, the market is voting with price, and the price says execution risk dominates.

Bullish

  • Analyst consensus overwhelmingly bullish: All 19 covering analysts rate QXO a 'strong_buy' (recommendation mean 1.21), with an average target of $25.11 implying +139% upside from $10.51. Even the lowest target of $14.00 sits 33% above the current price, and Citigroup, RBC, KeyBanc, Baird and Oppenheimer have all reiterated positive ratings between April and July 2026 with no downgrades.
  • Revenue scaling at step-function pace: Q2 2026 revenue hit $3.246 billion, up 70.27% year-over-year, versus just $13.5 million in Q1 2025 before the roll-up began. Consensus revenue of $31.86 billion (range $28.98B-$35.18B) shows the Street expects the TopBuild deal to keep compounding the platform toward the ~$50 billion decade target.
  • Gross margin inflecting sharply upward: Q2 2026 gross margin jumped to 24.74% from 14.17% in Q1 2026 and 16.94% in Q4 2025, lifting gross profit to $803 million. If this mid-20s level holds, it is the single clearest evidence that acquired businesses are being integrated with pricing discipline rather than bought at any cost.
  • Liquidity and leverage not yet stressed: QXO holds $2.774 billion of cash, a current ratio of 3.578, and debt-to-equity of just 0.403 — a conservative balance sheet for a company that just closed a $17 billion acquisition. This gives management room to keep buying without an immediate solvency question.

Bearish

  • Persistent cash burn and negative FCF: Q2 2026 free cash flow was -$248.1 million (operating cash flow -$216.6 million) after a $417.5 million working-capital build, and TTM FCF of $140.6 million yields only ~1.2% on an $11.8 billion market cap. The company funded growth with $2.038 billion of stock issuance in Q2 2026, not internal cash generation.
  • Still unprofitable with negative interest coverage: Q2 2026 net income was -$55 million (-1.69% margin), operating margin is -0.83%, ROE is -2.88%, and interest coverage is -1.11x against $38 million of quarterly interest expense. The 19.65x forward PE rests on consensus EPS of $1.92 versus a current quarterly EPS of -$0.0717 — a swing that has not yet been demonstrated.
  • Falling knife technicals with no base: QXO is down 42.57% over one year, 49.88% over six months, and 46.70% YTD, trading at just 2.7% of its 52-week range ($10.04-$27.61) and 4.5% above the low. It has underperformed SPY by 55.70 points over one year, and the one-month decline (-14.41%) is steeper than the three-month pace (-23.12%), signaling acceleration rather than stabilization.
  • Extreme volatility and heavy short interest: Beta of 2.276 means a 10% SPY move implies roughly a 23% QXO move, and the 6.22-day short ratio reflects meaningful bearish positioning. Max drawdown of -62.54% shows how violently the stock can reprice when the roll-up narrative wobbles.

QXO Technical Analysis

QXO is in a pronounced, sustained downtrend: the stock is down 42.57% over the past year, 49.88% over six months, and 46.70% year-to-date, a collapse that has left it trading at roughly 2.7% of its 52-week range (52-week high of $27.61 versus low of $10.04, with the current price of $10.51 just above the low). That positioning near the bottom of the range is the signature of a falling knife rather than a value opportunity — the stock has lost more than half its value from the highs and shows no durable base, with a max drawdown of -62.54% underscoring the severity of the de-rating. Relative strength confirms the damage: QXO has underperformed SPY by 55.70 percentage points over one year and 58.15 points year-to-date, meaning this is a company-specific repricing, not a market-driven pullback.

Short-term momentum is uniformly negative and, if anything, deteriorating: the stock is down 14.41% over the past month and 23.12% over three months, with the one-month decline steeper than the three-month pace, indicating acceleration to the downside rather than stabilization. The most recent session alone saw a -4.63% move (from $11.02 to $10.51) on volume of roughly 18.35 million shares, suggesting selling pressure remains active rather than exhausted. Critically, the one-month trend (-14.41%) is directionally consistent with the one-year trend (-42.57%) — there is no bullish divergence to point to, only persistent weakness, and the stock's relative strength of -13.39 points versus SPY over one month shows it is losing ground even in a modestly soft tape (SPY -1.02% over the same period).

Key technical levels are stark: support sits at the 52-week low of $10.04, just 4.5% below the current $10.51, and a decisive break below that level would signal a fresh leg lower with no visible floor. Resistance is anchored at the 52-week high of $27.61, but more practically at the $13-$15 zone where the stock repeatedly failed in August and September; reclaiming that area would be the first evidence of a trend change. With a beta of 2.276, QXO is roughly 2.3 times as volatile as the market — a critical input for position sizing, since a 10% SPY move implies a roughly 23% QXO move, and the elevated short ratio of 6.22 days-to-cover suggests meaningful bearish positioning that could amplify either a squeeze or further capitulation.

Beta

2.28

2.28x market volatility

Max Drawdown

-62.5%

Largest decline past year

52-Week Range

$10-$28

Price range past year

Annual Return

-40.0%

Cumulative gain past year

PeriodQXO ReturnS&P 500
1m-10.4%+0.9%
3m-19.3%+4.1%
6m-45.2%+7.2%
1y-40.0%+12.4%
ytd-44.9%+13.3%

Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner

Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions

QXO Fundamental Analysis

QXO's revenue trajectory has been transformed by acquisition rather than organic growth: Q2 2026 revenue reached $3.246 billion, up 70.27% year-over-year, following $1.730 billion in Q1 2026, $2.194 billion in Q4 2025, and $2.728 billion in Q3 2025 — a step-function expansion from the $13.5 million reported in Q1 2025 before the distribution roll-up began. The sequential pattern is uneven (Q4 2025's $2.194 billion dipped from Q3's $2.728 billion before rebounding to $3.246 billion in Q2 2026), reflecting acquisition timing and seasonality rather than clean organic momentum, and the single reportable segment disclosure limits visibility into which product lines are driving growth. The investment case therefore hinges less on current organic growth and more on whether management can integrate TopBuild and prior deals into the stated ~$50 billion revenue ambition, with consensus revenue estimates of $31.86 billion (range $28.98 billion to $35.18 billion) implying the market expects substantial further scaling.

Profitability remains the weak link: Q2 2026 net income was -$55 million on $3.246 billion of revenue (a -1.69% net margin), an improvement from Q1 2026's -$227.1 million loss (-13.13% margin) and Q4 2025's -$90.2 million, but still negative. Gross margin has been volatile — 24.74% in Q2 2026 versus 14.17% in Q1 2026, 16.94% in Q4 2025, and 17.53% in Q3 2025 — and the trailing gross margin of 16.80% is thin for industrial distribution, leaving little cushion; operating margin of -0.83% and EBITDA of $151 million (4.65% EBITDA margin) show the business is close to breakeven at the operating line but burdened by $38 million of quarterly interest expense and $196 million of D&A. The path to profitability depends on realizing scale synergies and stabilizing gross margin in the mid-20s, and the gap between the -$0.0717 quarterly EPS and the consensus forward EPS estimate of $1.92 illustrates how much improvement the Street is underwriting.

Balance-sheet and cash-flow metrics are a mixed picture: debt-to-equity is a manageable 0.403 and the current ratio is a strong 3.578, with $2.774 billion of cash at the end of Q2 2026 providing substantial liquidity. However, Q2 2026 free cash flow was -$248.1 million (operating cash flow -$216.6 million) driven by a $417.5 million working-capital build and $1.965 billion of acquisition spending, and trailing twelve-month FCF of just $140.6 million against an $11.8 billion market cap yields a paltry ~1.2% FCF yield. ROE of -2.88% and ROA of -0.27% confirm the company is not yet earning its cost of capital, and with interest coverage negative (-1.11x in the Q2 2026 ratio set), QXO remains dependent on capital markets — evidenced by $2.038 billion of common stock issued in Q2 2026 — to fund its acquisition-led growth rather than self-funding internally.

Quarterly Revenue

$3.2B

2026-06

Revenue YoY Growth

+70.3%

YoY Comparison

Gross Margin

24.7%

Latest Quarter

Free Cash Flow

$140599999.0B

Last 12 Months

Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)

Revenue Breakdown

Reportable Segment

Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!

Valuation Analysis: Is QXO Overvalued?

Because QXO's trailing net income is negative (EPS of -$0.0236, trailing PE of -30.62x), the PE ratio is not meaningful and I am leading with the price-to-sales ratio of 1.73x, supplemented by EV/Sales of 1.84x and the forward PE of 19.65x. The gap between the negative trailing PE and the 19.65x forward PE is enormous and implies the market expects a dramatic swing to profitability — consistent with consensus forward EPS of $1.92 versus the current loss — so the forward multiple is effectively a bet on integration synergies and margin recovery rather than a reflection of current earnings power. EV/EBITDA of 51.55x and price-to-cash-flow of 45.24x both signal that current cash generation is far too thin to support the enterprise value without the earnings inflection the forward numbers assume.

On a peer basis, the 1.73x PS and 1.84x EV/Sales are not obviously expensive for a distribution roll-up with $3.2 billion in quarterly revenue, but the 51.55x EV/EBITDA stands in sharp contrast to typical industrial distribution multiples in the low-to-mid teens, a premium of well over 200% that is only defensible if EBITDA scales rapidly toward the consensus revenue base of $31.86 billion. The negative net margin of -4.08% and gross margin of 16.80% are below what scaled distributors typically earn, meaning QXO trades at a growth-and-transformation premium while currently exhibiting inferior profitability — a combination that requires flawless execution to justify. The 1.22x price-to-book is the one metric that looks genuinely cheap, reflecting that the market is valuing the equity close to tangible book after the acquisition-driven asset build.

Historically, QXO's multiples have been distorted by its pre-roll-up shell status — PS ratios above 400x in 2024 and 2025 — so the current 1.73x PS represents a complete normalization to distribution-economics valuation as revenue scaled. Within the post-transformation period, the PS ratio has compressed from 8.36x in Q1 2026 to 4.08x in Q2 2026 to 1.73x currently, a rapid de-rating that reflects both the revenue base expanding and the share price collapsing; the stock is therefore near the bottom of its own (short) valuation band, which could signal either deep value or continued fundamental deterioration. The PEG ratio of -0.065 is not meaningful given negative earnings, and the 0.89% dividend yield with a payout ratio of -0.375 confirms the dividend is not covered by earnings — investors should treat the current valuation as a leveraged call option on the roll-up thesis rather than a conventionally cheap stock.

PE

-30.6x

Latest Quarter

vs. Historical

Low-End

5-Year PE Range 13x~122x

vs. Industry Avg

N/A

Industry PE ~N/A*

EV/EBITDA

51.6x

Enterprise Value Multiple

Investment Risk Disclosure

Financial and operational risks center on a business that is growing by acquisition while burning cash. Q2 2026 free cash flow was -$248.1 million, driven by a $417.5 million working-capital build and $1.965 billion of acquisition spending, and TTM FCF of just $140.6 million against an $11.8 billion market cap is a ~1.2% yield. Net income of -$55 million on $3.246 billion of revenue, operating margin of -0.83%, and negative interest coverage of -1.11x against $38 million of quarterly interest expense mean the company depends on capital markets — it issued $2.038 billion of stock in Q2 2026 — rather than self-funding. Gross margin volatility (24.74% in Q2 2026 versus 14.17% in Q1 2026) and single-segment disclosure limit visibility into whether the improvement is structural or mix-driven.

Market and competitive risks are amplified by valuation and volatility. EV/EBITDA of 51.55x is more than 200% above typical industrial distribution multiples, so any disappointment in synergy realization invites multiple compression toward peer levels. Beta of 2.276 means QXO moves roughly 2.3 times the market, and the 6.22-day short ratio shows bears are positioned for further weakness; a 10% SPY drawdown would imply a ~23% QXO decline. Recent coverage explicitly frames the $17 billion TopBuild deal as 'fraught with profitability and integration risks' and flags competitor IBP as a potentially safer way to play the same theme, while the stock's -55.70 point one-year relative underperformance versus SPY confirms this is company-specific repricing, not sector rotation.

The worst-case scenario is a failed integration: gross margin reverts toward the 14-17% range, the forward EPS of $1.92 is not delivered, and a dilutive equity raise is needed to service debt and fund the next deal. In that chain, the stock breaks the $10.04 52-week low with no visible technical floor, and the realistic downside from $10.51 is roughly -35% to -45% toward the $6-$7 area implied by applying a low-teens EV/EBITDA multiple to current EBITDA of $151 million. The -62.54% max drawdown is a reminder of how far this name can fall; the analyst low target of $14.00 offers no downside protection because it is above the current price.