SM Energy
SM
$33.75
+4.10%
SM Energy Company is an independent energy company focused on the acquisition, exploration, development, and production of oil, natural gas, and natural gas liquids (NGLs) in the United States, primarily in the Midland Basin of West Texas, the Maverick Basin of South Texas, and the Uinta Basin of northeastern Utah. As a mid-cap exploration and production (E&P) player, SM Energy differentiates itself through a multi-basin portfolio that balances oil-weighted growth with gas and NGL exposure, providing operational flexibility in a volatile commodity environment. The current investor narrative centers on the company's strong operational momentum, highlighted by a 50% year-to-date stock price surge, driven by rising energy prices and improved capital efficiency, while also facing scrutiny over its recent quarterly loss and elevated capital expenditures. Recent news highlights the broader tailwind of surging fuel prices, which is boosting energy stocks like SM Energy, though concerns about inflation and consumer spending persist.…
SM
SM Energy
$33.75
Investment Opinion: Should I buy SM Today?
Rating: Buy. SM Energy offers a compelling risk/reward with a consensus Buy rating and an average target price of $38.40, implying 33.8% upside. The thesis is that the stock is undervalued relative to its asset base and earnings potential, and that the Q1 2026 loss is a non-recurring event. Supporting evidence includes a PS ratio of 0.68x vs. the industry average of 2.42x, an EV/EBITDA of 2.10x, a trailing PE of 3.31x, and a forward PE of 3.91x, all indicating a deep discount. Revenue growth of 76.15% YoY in Q1 2026, though partly one-time, shows the company's ability to generate top-line expansion. However, the negative free cash flow and volatile earnings are red flags that could invalidate the thesis. This Buy would be downgraded to Hold if the stock approaches the average target of $38.40 without further upside catalysts, or if commodity prices drop more than 15% from current levels. Conversely, it could be upgraded to Strong Buy if the company demonstrates consistent profitability and positive free cash flow in the next two quarters. Overall, SM is undervalued relative to its history and peers, but investors should be prepared for volatility.
Sign up to view all
SM 12-Month Price Forecast
The AI assessment leans bullish due to the deep valuation discount and positive analyst sentiment, but confidence is medium given the operational volatility. The key is whether SM can convert its revenue growth into sustainable profitability. If the company posts positive earnings and free cash flow in the next two quarters, the bullish case strengthens, and the stock could re-rate higher. Conversely, if the Q1 2026 loss is followed by more red ink, the bear case gains traction, and the stock could fall to its 52-week low. Monitoring the next earnings report and commodity price trends will be crucial.
Wall Street consensus
Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on SM Energy's 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $39.13 and implied upside of +15.9% versus the current price.
Average Target
$39.13
0 analysts
Implied Upside
+15.9%
vs. current price
Analyst Count
—
covering this stock
Price Range
$32 - $52
Analyst target range
SM Energy is covered by 15 analysts, with a consensus recommendation of 'Buy' and a mean recommendation score of 1.8 (where 1 is Strong Buy and 5 is Sell). The average target price is $38.40, implying an upside of +33.8% from the current price of $28.70. The target range is $32.00 (low) to $52.00 (high), with the high target suggesting a potential +81.2% upside, while the low target still implies +11.5% upside. Recent ratings actions show a positive shift, with Roth Capital upgrading from Neutral to Buy in June 2026 and Raymond James upgrading from Underperform to Outperform in May 2026, indicating growing institutional confidence. The wide spread between low and high targets (20 points) reflects uncertainty about commodity prices and the company's capital allocation strategy, but the overall bullish consensus suggests analysts see more upside than downside.
Drowning in data?
Find the real signal!
Bulls vs Bears: SM Investment Factors
SM Energy presents a classic value-versus-quality dilemma. On the bullish side, the stock trades at a steep discount to peers (PS 0.68x vs. 2.42x industry), has a Buy consensus with 33.8% upside, and benefits from strong operational momentum and a diversified asset base. However, the bear case is equally compelling: the Q1 2026 net loss, negative free cash flow, and revenue volatility indicate operational instability, while high debt and interest costs add financial risk. The single most important tension is whether the Q1 2026 loss was a one-time event (e.g., impairment) or a sign of structural issues. If the loss is non-recurring and commodity prices remain supportive, the stock is undervalued; if not, the low multiples may be justified. Currently, the evidence slightly favors the bulls given the analyst upgrades and valuation discount, but the risk is elevated.
Bullish
- Analyst consensus Buy with 33.8% upside: 15 analysts rate SM a Buy with a mean recommendation of 1.8 (Strong Buy to Buy). The average target price of $38.40 implies a 33.8% upside from the current $28.70, and even the low target of $32.00 offers 11.5% upside, indicating a favorable risk/reward.
- Deep valuation discount to sector: SM trades at a PS ratio of 0.68x versus the industry average of 2.42x, and an EV/EBITDA of 2.10x, well below typical E&P multiples. This suggests the market is pricing in significant skepticism, but also provides a margin of safety if operations stabilize.
- Strong operational momentum in 2026: The stock is up 50% YTD and 36.15% over the past 6 months, driven by rising fuel prices and improved capital efficiency. Recent upgrades from Roth Capital (Neutral to Buy) and Raymond James (Underperform to Outperform) reflect growing institutional confidence.
- Multi-basin portfolio provides flexibility: SM's assets in the Midland, Maverick, and Uinta Basins offer a balanced mix of oil, gas, and NGLs, allowing the company to adapt to commodity price shifts. This diversification reduces single-basin risk and supports operational resilience.
Bearish
- Q1 2026 net loss of -$335 million: Despite a 76.15% YoY revenue surge to $1.479 billion, SM reported a net loss of -$335 million (EPS -$2.91) due to $1.175 billion in other expenses and a -20.15% operating margin. This highlights the risk of one-time charges and cost overruns.
- Revenue volatility and deceleration: Excluding the Q1 2026 spike, revenue declined from $785 million in Q2 2025 to $718 million in Q4 2025, indicating a decelerating trend. The reliance on a one-time event for growth raises sustainability concerns.
- Negative free cash flow: TTM free cash flow is -$225.6 million, reflecting heavy capital expenditures and operational inefficiencies. This could limit the company's ability to reduce debt or return capital to shareholders.
- High debt levels: Debt-to-equity is 0.59, and interest expense in Q1 2026 was $113 million, up from $30 million in Q4 2025. Elevated debt service costs could strain profitability if commodity prices fall.
SM Technical Analysis
SM Energy's stock has exhibited a robust recovery over the past year, with a 1-year price change of +7.05%, though this lags the S&P 500's +21.46% gain. The current price of $28.70 sits at 80% of the 52-week range (low: $17.45, high: $35.88), indicating the stock is trading closer to its highs, reflecting strong momentum but also potential overextension. The 6-month price change of +36.15% underscores a powerful uptrend, yet the stock remains below its 52-week high, suggesting room for further upside if resistance is broken.
Beta
0.74
0.74x market volatility
Max Drawdown
-39.4%
Largest decline past year
52-Week Range
$17-$36
Price range past year
Annual Return
+26.3%
Cumulative gain past year
| Period | SM Return | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1m | +12.8% | +2.9% |
| 3m | +3.6% | +5.0% |
| 6m | +57.3% | +13.9% |
| 1y | +26.3% | +20.4% |
| ytd | +76.4% | +13.8% |
Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner
Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions
SM Fundamental Analysis
Revenue trajectory has been volatile, with the most recent quarter (Q1 2026) reporting revenue of $1,479 million, a 76.15% YoY increase, but this was driven by a one-time event (likely an acquisition or asset sale) as prior quarters showed revenue around $700-800 million. The multi-quarter trend shows a deceleration from Q2 2025's $785 million to Q4 2025's $718 million, before the Q1 2026 spike. This revenue surge did not translate to profitability, as the company reported a net loss of -$335 million in Q1 2026, with EPS of -$2.91, compared to positive EPS of $0.95 in Q4 2025. The gross margin in Q1 2026 was 71.06%, up from 18.89% in Q4 2025, but operating margin was -20.15%, indicating significant operating expenses and impairments. The company's profitability has been inconsistent, with net margins ranging from -22.65% in Q1 2026 to 25.69% in Q2 2025, reflecting commodity price volatility and one-time charges.
Quarterly Revenue
$1.5B
2026-03
Revenue YoY Growth
+76.1%
YoY Comparison
Gross Margin
71.1%
Latest Quarter
Free Cash Flow
$-225597000.0B
Last 12 Months
Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)
Revenue Breakdown
Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!
Valuation Analysis: Is SM Overvalued?
Given the negative net income in the most recent quarter, the price-to-sales (PS) ratio is the primary valuation metric, currently at 0.68x, which is significantly lower than the industry average of 2.42x (based on historical data), indicating a substantial discount. The trailing PE ratio of 3.31x is based on positive TTM earnings, but the forward PE of 3.91x suggests the market expects earnings to decline slightly, which is unusual given the revenue growth. The EV/EBITDA multiple of 2.10x is also low, reflecting the market's skepticism about the sustainability of recent earnings. Compared to the sector, SM Energy trades at a steep discount, which may be justified by its volatile earnings and high debt levels, but could also represent a value opportunity if the company can stabilize its operations.
PE
3.3x
Latest Quarter
vs. Historical
Low-End
5-Year PE Range 2x~6x
vs. Industry Avg
N/A
Industry PE ~N/A*
EV/EBITDA
2.1x
Enterprise Value Multiple
Investment Risk Disclosure
Financial & Operational Risks: SM Energy's financial health is under pressure from negative free cash flow of -$225.6 million TTM and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.59. The Q1 2026 net loss of -$335 million, driven by $1.175 billion in other expenses, highlights the risk of one-time charges that can wipe out quarterly profits. Interest expense surged to $113 million in Q1 2026 from $30 million in Q4 2025, indicating rising debt service costs that could strain cash flows if commodity prices weaken. Revenue concentration in a few basins (Midland, Maverick, Uinta) exposes the company to regional operational risks, such as pipeline constraints or regulatory changes.
FAQ
The key risks for SM Energy include: 1) Financial risk: Negative free cash flow of -$225.6 million and debt-to-equity of 0.59 could strain liquidity if commodity prices fall. 2) Operational risk: The Q1 2026 net loss of -$335 million, driven by $1.175 billion in other expenses, highlights the potential for one-time charges that can wipe out profits. 3) Market risk: The stock's beta of 0.738 means it is less volatile than the market, but it also underperformed the S&P 500 by 14.41% over the past year, indicating sector-specific headwinds. 4) Commodity price risk: A decline in oil and gas prices would directly impact revenue and profitability, potentially pushing the stock to its 52-week low of $17.45.
The 12-month forecast for SM Energy is bullish, with a base case target of $38.40 (analyst average) and a bull case target of $52.00 (analyst high). The bear case target is $17.45 (52-week low). Probabilities are 30% bull, 50% base, and 20% bear. The most likely scenario is the base case, where commodity prices remain stable and SM gradually improves its operations, leading to a 33.8% upside. However, the stock's performance is highly dependent on oil prices and the company's ability to avoid further losses. If oil prices stay above $70 and SM posts positive earnings, the stock could reach the higher targets.
SM Energy is undervalued relative to its peers and its own history. The PS ratio of 0.68x is significantly below the industry average of 2.42x, and the EV/EBITDA of 2.10x is also low. The trailing PE of 3.31x and forward PE of 3.91x suggest the market expects earnings to decline slightly, but these multiples are still cheap. The market is pricing in skepticism about the sustainability of recent earnings and the impact of high debt. If SM can demonstrate consistent profitability, the valuation could re-rate higher. However, the negative net income in Q1 2026 justifies some discount, so the stock is not a clear bargain but offers value for those willing to take on risk.
SM Energy offers a compelling risk/reward with a consensus Buy rating and an average target price of $38.40, implying 33.8% upside from the current $28.70. The stock trades at a deep discount to peers (PS 0.68x vs. 2.42x industry), which provides a margin of safety. However, the Q1 2026 net loss of -$335 million and negative free cash flow of -$225.6 million are significant red flags. For investors with a high risk tolerance and a positive outlook on oil prices, SM could be a good buy, but it is not suitable for conservative investors. The biggest downside risk is a decline in commodity prices, which could push the stock to its 52-week low of $17.45, a -39% loss.
SM Energy is more suitable for short-term to medium-term trading due to its high volatility and operational uncertainties. The stock has a beta of 0.738, which is lower than the market, but its earnings are highly sensitive to commodity prices, leading to significant price swings. The 52-week range of $17.45 to $35.88 shows a wide trading band, offering opportunities for traders. For long-term investors, the company's high debt and negative free cash flow are concerns, but if oil prices remain strong and SM can improve its balance sheet, it could be a long-term holding. A suggested minimum holding period is 12-18 months to allow for operational improvements and potential re-rating.
