AutoZone
AZO
$3120.59
+1.99%
AutoZone, Inc. is the largest US-based retailer of aftermarket automotive parts and accessories, operating over 7,600 stores across the United States, Mexico, and Brazil and generating more than $20 billion in annual sales. The company serves two distinct customer cohorts — do-it-yourself (DIY) retail customers, roughly two-thirds of domestic sales, and commercial do-it-for-me (DIFM) shops — giving it a dual-engine model that spans discretionary retail and recurring professional demand. As the scale leader in a consolidated specialty retail category, AutoZone's competitive identity rests on its dense hub-and-spoke distribution network, industry-leading SKU availability, and a decades-long share-repurchase program that has compounded per-share value despite a persistently negative book equity position. The current investor debate centers on decelerating same-store sales and a sharp May 2026 selloff tied to disappointing earnings and international expansion concerns, compounded by competitive anxiety after reports that O'Reilly may acquire Genuine Parts' NAPA distribution business; against this, the stock has rebounded sharply into October on a Q4 EPS beat, leaving investors to weigh whether the pullback is a value entry point or the start of a structural growth slowdown.…
AZO
AutoZone
$3120.59
Related headlines
Investment Opinion: Should I buy AZO Today?
Rating: Hold. The core thesis is that AutoZone is a high-quality market leader trading at a reasonable valuation (18.97x trailing PE, 16.22x forward) with a strong analyst consensus (strong_buy, average target $3,719.96 implying +19.2% upside), but near-term growth deceleration and competitive threats warrant a cautious stance until revenue trends stabilize. The analyst consensus rating of strong_buy and average target price of $3,719.96 anchor the view that the stock is undervalued relative to its earnings power, but the wide target range ($3,000–$4,800) reflects uncertainty.
Supporting evidence includes: (1) valuation at 18.97x trailing PE is below the historical range of 22.4x–34.1x, and forward PE of 16.22x is a ~14.5% discount to trailing; (2) revenue growth of +5.64% YoY in Q4 2026, while decelerating, remains positive and is supported by 7,600+ stores and international expansion; (3) profitability is improving with gross margin at 53.34% (up from 51.52%) and net margin at 14.13% (up from 13.41%); (4) free cash flow TTM of $1.122 billion, though a thin 2.3% yield, still funds buybacks and dividends (payout ratio 0%, no dividend); and (5) the implied upside to the average analyst target is +19.2%, with the low target of $3,000 only -3.9% below current price, providing a margin of safety.
The biggest risks that could invalidate the thesis are: (1) a successful O'Reilly/NAPA combination that erodes AutoZone's commercial market share; (2) a continued deceleration in same-store sales leading to earnings estimate cuts; and (3) balance-sheet constraints from negative equity and tight liquidity (current ratio 0.901) limiting financial flexibility. The rating would upgrade to Buy if same-store sales reaccelerate above 3% or if the stock pulls back to the $2,800–$2,900 range (near the 52-week low) with stabilizing fundamentals. It would downgrade to Sell if revenue growth turns negative or if gross margins fall below 50%. Relative to its history and peers, the stock appears undervalued at 18.97x trailing PE, but the discount is partly deserved given growth deceleration; fair value is likely in the $3,300–$3,500 range, implying modest upside from current levels.
Sign up to view all
AZO 12-Month Price Forecast
The forward view is balanced with a neutral stance. Valuation appears attractive at 18.97x trailing earnings, well below the stock's historical range, and the analyst consensus remains strongly positive with a $3,719.96 average target. However, revenue growth has decelerated to mid-single digits, and the competitive landscape could shift if O'Reilly acquires NAPA. The recent +9.53% one-month rally suggests the market is pricing in a rebound, but the stock remains -22.14% over the past year. I would upgrade to bullish if same-store sales reaccelerate above 3% or if the stock pulls back to the $2,800–$2,900 range with stabilizing fundamentals. I would downgrade to bearish if revenue growth turns negative or if gross margins fall below 50%.
Wall Street consensus
Most Wall Street analysts maintain a constructive view on AutoZone's 12-month outlook, with a consensus price target around $3719.96 and implied upside of +19.2% versus the current price.
Average Target
$3719.96
0 analysts
Implied Upside
+19.2%
vs. current price
Analyst Count
—
covering this stock
Price Range
$3000 - $4800
Analyst target range
Coverage is deep and conviction is high: 23 analysts follow AutoZone with a consensus recommendation of "strong_buy" and a recommendation mean of 1.48 (where 1.0 is a strong buy). The average target price of $3,719.96 implies +19.2% upside from the current $3,120.59, and the consensus forward EPS estimate of $256.80 (range $250.60–$262.79) on estimated revenue of $26.46 billion (range $25.97–$26.94 billion) underpins that optimism. The sentiment leans clearly bullish, and the recent institutional ratings flow confirms it — the September 23, 2026 cohort shows JPMorgan, Guggenheim, Raymond James, BMO, DA Davidson, Barclays, Roth Capital, and Truist all maintaining Buy/Outperform/Strong Buy ratings, with only Baird and Mizuho at Neutral and no downgrades in the visible record.
The target range of $3,000 to $4,800 is wide — a 60% spread from low to high — signaling meaningful disagreement about the growth trajectory. The $4,800 high target implies roughly +54% upside and would require a re-rating toward the upper end of the historical PE band, likely contingent on reaccelerating commercial DIFM growth, successful international expansion, and no competitive disruption from a potential O'Reilly/NAPA deal. The $3,000 low target sits just below the current price and effectively prices in continued same-store-sales deceleration and margin pressure without a full bear case. Notably, the low target is above the 52-week low of $2,730.65, suggesting even the bears see the stock as near fair value. With 23 analysts, a strong_buy consensus, and a tight cluster of reiterated ratings around the Q4 print, the signal strength is high — but investors should recognize that the bullish consensus was in place through a -22% year, which argues for treating targets as directional rather than precise.
Drowning in data?
Find the real signal!
Bulls vs Bears: AZO Investment Factors
The bear case currently has stronger evidence due to decelerating revenue growth (+5.64% YoY), competitive threats from a potential O'Reilly/NAPA combination, and a -22% one-year decline that has crushed relative strength. However, the bull case is gaining traction: valuation is near multi-year lows (18.97x trailing PE), margins are expanding (53.34% gross margin), and the analyst consensus remains overwhelmingly positive with a $3,719.96 average target. The single most important tension is whether the revenue slowdown is cyclical (driven by macro pressures and weather) or structural (market share loss to competitors). If Q1 2027 same-store sales reaccelerate above 3%, the stock could re-rate toward the $4,000+ range; if they decelerate further, the low target of $3,000 may be tested.
Bullish
- Deep analyst consensus with strong buy rating: 23 analysts cover AZO with a consensus recommendation of 'strong_buy' and a mean rating of 1.48 (where 1.0 is a strong buy). The average target price of $3,719.96 implies +19.2% upside from the current $3,120.59, and the low target of $3,000 sits just 3.9% below the current price, suggesting even bears see limited downside.
- Valuation near multi-year lows: The trailing PE of 18.97x is well below the 22.4x–34.1x range seen during earlier fiscal 2026 quarters and far below the 30.6x at Q1 2026. The forward PE of 16.22x represents a ~14.5% discount to trailing earnings, implying the market expects earnings growth to close the gap.
- Margin expansion despite revenue deceleration: Q4 2026 gross margin expanded to 53.34% from 51.52% a year ago, and net margin rose to 14.13% from 13.41%. Operating margin of 19.97% in Q4 reflects disciplined SG&A control at 33.4% of revenue, showing the company can protect profitability even as sales growth slows.
- Low beta offers defensive characteristics: Beta of 0.398 means AZO moves roughly 40% as much as the market, providing portfolio diversification benefits. This low systematic risk is attractive in volatile markets, and the recent +9.53% one-month rally (vs. SPY +1.22%) shows the stock can rebound sharply on company-specific catalysts.
Bearish
- Revenue growth decelerating to mid-single digits: Q4 2026 revenue grew +5.64% year-over-year to $6.595 billion, a slowdown from historical high-single-digit growth. The sequential quarterly progression through fiscal 2026 ($4.628B, $4.274B, $4.841B, $6.595B) shows only modest growth, and consensus forward revenue of $26.46 billion implies continued mid-single-digit expansion.
- Competitive threat from O'Reilly/NAPA deal: Reports that O'Reilly may acquire Genuine Parts' NAPA distribution business triggered a -6% single-day drop on July 6, 2026. Such a combination would create a formidable competitor with expanded scale and distribution, potentially pressuring AutoZone's commercial DIFM share gains and pricing power.
- Negative equity and leveraged balance sheet: The company carries negative shareholders' equity, producing a debt-to-equity ratio of -4.97 and ROE of -102.8%, artifacts of aggressive buybacks ($580.7 million repurchased in Q3 alone). Interest expense of $148.6 million in Q4 consumed 12.7% of operating income, and the current ratio of 0.901 indicates tight liquidity.
- Thin free cash flow yield: Free cash flow TTM is $1.122 billion against a $48.8 billion market cap, a thin ~2.3% FCF yield. Q3 operating cash flow of $802.0 million was largely consumed by $345.5 million of capex and $580.7 million of buybacks, raising questions about the sustainability of the buyback-driven EPS growth model.
AZO Technical Analysis
AutoZone is in a sustained medium-term downtrend that has only recently begun to stabilize. The stock is down -22.14% over the trailing year versus a +15.53% gain for the S&P 500, a relative strength gap of -37.67 percentage points, and it remains -5.55% year-to-date. At the current price of $3,120.59, the stock sits at roughly 29.8% of its 52-week range of $2,730.65 to $4,040.00 — closer to the low than the high, which in a name with a -35.88% max drawdown signals a market still repairing damage rather than a momentum leader. That positioning is a double-edged sword: it offers a valuation cushion, but the falling-knife risk is real until the trend structure confirms a higher low.
Short-term momentum has turned decisively positive and now diverges sharply from the longer-term trend. The stock is up +9.53% over the past month and +2.43% over three months, and the most recent session added +1.99% on volume of 258,801 shares. The 1-month relative strength versus SPY is +8.31 points, a stark reversal from the -37.67 one-year relative strength, suggesting aggressive mean-reversion buying into an oversold name rather than a confirmed trend reversal. The +60.97 absolute price change from the prior close area underscores how violent the bounce has been — the stock rallied from roughly $2,792 on October 2 to $3,120.59 by October 16, a move that likely pushed short-term RSI into overbought territory and raises the odds of a consolidation pause.
Key technical levels are well defined. Support sits at the 52-week low of $2,730.65, with secondary support around the $2,790–$2,850 shelf that held in early October; resistance is the 52-week high of $4,040.00, with an intermediate hurdle near $3,200–$3,300 where the stock stalled in July and August. A breakout above $3,300 on volume would signal the downtrend is broken and open a path toward the highs, while a breakdown below $2,730 would confirm the bearish structure and likely trigger further de-risking. Volatility is a critical consideration: beta of 0.398 means the stock moves roughly 40% as much as the market, so despite the violent idiosyncratic swings, its systematic risk is low — position sizing should account for company-specific event risk (earnings, competitive news) rather than market beta.
Beta
0.40
0.40x market volatility
Max Drawdown
-34.9%
Largest decline past year
52-Week Range
$2731-$4040
Price range past year
Annual Return
-22.1%
Cumulative gain past year
| Period | AZO Return | S&P 500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1m | +9.5% | +0.2% |
| 3m | +2.4% | +2.9% |
| 6m | -12.6% | +8.4% |
| 1y | -22.1% | +14.9% |
| ytd | -5.5% | +11.9% |
Bobby - Your AI Investment Partner
Get real-time data, AI-driven personalized investment analysis to make smarter investment decisions
AZO Fundamental Analysis
Revenue growth is positive but decelerating, and that is the crux of the bear case. Fiscal Q4 2026 (quarter ended August 29, 2026) revenue came in at $6.595 billion, up +5.64% year-over-year, but that compares against $6.243 billion in the prior-year Q4 — a quarter that itself grew only modestly. The sequential quarterly progression through fiscal 2026 was $4.628 billion (Q1), $4.274 billion (Q2), $4.841 billion (Q3), and $6.595 billion (Q4), and the year-over-year comparison shows growth in the mid-single digits rather than the high-single-digit pace investors historically paid up for. The single reported segment, Auto Parts Locations, generated $4.841 billion in the Q3 period, and with 86% of revenue domestic, the growth algorithm now depends disproportionately on commercial DIFM share gains and Mexico/Brazil store additions — the very international expansion that headlines flagged as a concern. Consensus revenue of $26.46 billion for the forward year implies continued mid-single-digit growth, so the investment case hinges on whether that is a floor or a ceiling.
Profitability remains robust and is actually improving at the margin. Q4 2026 net income was $931.6 million on a 14.13% net margin, up from $837.0 million and a 13.41% net margin in the prior-year Q4, while gross margin expanded to 53.34% from 51.52%. The full-year net margin of 12.65% and gross margin of 52.34% are healthy for specialty retail, and operating margin of 18.31% (with Q4 operating income of $1.317 billion, a 19.97% operating margin) reflects disciplined SG&A control — Q4 SG&A of $2.201 billion was 33.4% of revenue. The one blemish is the Q2 2026 trough, when net margin compressed to 10.97% and operating margin to 16.34%, showing that seasonal mix and expense timing can swing results meaningfully. Interest expense of $148.6 million in Q4 consumed 12.7% of operating income, a reminder that the leveraged balance sheet is a structural margin drag.
Balance-sheet optics are unusual and require careful interpretation. The company carries negative shareholders' equity, producing a debt-to-equity ratio of -4.97, ROE of -102.8%, and a price-to-book of -19.51 — all artifacts of aggressive buybacks (Q3 alone saw $580.7 million repurchased) rather than distress. The real liquidity picture is tighter: current ratio of 0.901 and a quick ratio near 0.14 reflect an inventory-heavy, payables-funded working-capital model typical of auto parts retail. Free cash flow TTM is $1.122 billion against a $48.8 billion market cap, a thin ~2.3% FCF yield, and Q3 operating cash flow of $802.0 million was consumed by $345.5 million of capex and $580.7 million of buybacks. ROA of 11.35% and return on capital employed of 11.43% confirm the underlying business earns solid returns, but with interest coverage of 8.86x and a cash conversion cycle of -25.2 days, the company funds growth internally while leaning on supplier float — financial risk is moderate, not acute, but the buyback is increasingly debt- and cash-flow-dependent.
Quarterly Revenue
$6.6B
2026-08
Revenue YoY Growth
+5.6%
YoY Comparison
Gross Margin
53.3%
Latest Quarter
Free Cash Flow
$1.1B
Last 12 Months
Revenue & Net Income Trends (2 Years)
Revenue Breakdown
Open an Account, get $2 TSLA now!
Valuation Analysis: Is AZO Overvalued?
Because AutoZone is solidly profitable — Q4 net income of $931.6 million and a positive trailing EPS base — the PE ratio is the appropriate primary metric, and the negative book value makes PB and the -4.97 debt-to-equity ratio meaningless for valuation purposes. The stock trades at 18.97x trailing earnings but only 16.22x forward earnings, a ~14.5% discount that implies the market expects earnings growth to close the gap. That forward multiple is undemanding in absolute terms, but the PEG ratio of 3.86 signals the market is not yet convinced the growth rate justifies even that modest premium to its own history.
On relative valuation, the picture is mixed. The PS ratio of 2.40x and EV/Sales of 3.05x look inexpensive for a 52%-gross-margin retailer, but EV/EBITDA of 16.37x is a fuller multiple that reflects the debt load embedded in enterprise value. The trailing PE of 18.97x sits below the stock's own long-run average, and the forward PE of 16.22x versus a PEG of 3.86 suggests the discount is partly deserved given decelerating same-store sales. Industry-average multiples were not provided in the valuation dataset, so a precise peer spread cannot be quantified; qualitatively, AutoZone has historically commanded a premium to O'Reilly and Advance Auto Parts on scale and ROIC, and at ~19x trailing it now trades closer to parity — a de-rating that reflects competitive fears around a potential O'Reilly/NAPA combination.
Historical context is the most compelling part of the valuation case. AutoZone's PE ratio has ranged from roughly 12.8x to 34.1x across the quarterly snapshots in the historical ratios data, and the current 18.97x trailing PE sits in the lower-middle of that band — well below the 22.4x–34.1x readings seen during fiscal 2026's earlier quarters and far below the 30.6x recorded at Q1 2026. The PS ratio of 2.40x is likewise near the bottom of its multi-year range (which has run from roughly 7.4x to 15.1x on the quarterly snapshots, though those figures are computed on different share-count bases). In short, the market has already priced in a meaningful growth deceleration; the question is whether current expectations are too pessimistic or merely appropriately sober.
PE
19.0x
Latest Quarter
vs. Historical
Mid-Range
5-Year PE Range 13x~31x
vs. Industry Avg
N/A
Industry PE ~N/A*
EV/EBITDA
16.4x
Enterprise Value Multiple
Investment Risk Disclosure
Financial and operational risks are moderate but rising. The company's aggressive buyback program ($580.7 million in Q3 alone) has produced negative shareholders' equity, a debt-to-equity ratio of -4.97, and a ROE of -102.8%, which, while artifacts of capital return, complicate balance-sheet analysis. Interest expense of $148.6 million in Q4 consumed 12.7% of operating income, and the current ratio of 0.901 with a quick ratio near 0.14 indicates tight liquidity reliant on supplier float. Free cash flow TTM of $1.122 billion yields only ~2.3% of market cap, and Q3 operating cash flow of $802.0 million was largely absorbed by capex ($345.5 million) and buybacks ($580.7 million), raising questions about the sustainability of the buyback-driven EPS growth model if cash flow deteriorates further.
Market and competitive risks are significant. The stock trades at 18.97x trailing earnings, which is below its historical range but still a premium to some peers, and the PEG ratio of 3.86 suggests the market is not convinced growth justifies the multiple. The potential O'Reilly/NAPA acquisition, reported in July 2026, could reshape the competitive landscape by creating a larger, more efficient competitor, pressuring AutoZone's commercial DIFM share. Additionally, with 86% of revenue domestic, the company is sensitive to US macroeconomic conditions, and its beta of 0.398 means it has low market correlation but is still exposed to sector rotation away from consumer cyclical names. Recent news highlights slowing same-store sales and international expansion concerns, which have already driven a -22% one-year decline.
The worst-case scenario involves a continued deceleration in same-store sales, exacerbated by competitive share loss and a consumer pullback in discretionary DIY spending. If the O'Reilly/NAPA deal materializes and AutoZone fails to defend its commercial business, earnings estimates could be cut, leading to multiple compression. In this scenario, the stock could retest its 52-week low of $2,730.65, representing a -12.5% decline from the current $3,120.59. A more severe outcome, such as a recession that hits both DIY and DIFM demand, could push the stock toward the analyst low target of $3,000 (only -3.9% downside) but the 52-week low provides a realistic floor. The maximum drawdown over the past year was -35.88%, and a repeat of that from current levels would take the stock to roughly $2,000, though that seems extreme given the analyst consensus and margin strength.
FAQ
The key risks are: (1) Competitive risk – the potential O'Reilly/NAPA acquisition could create a larger competitor and pressure AutoZone's commercial market share, as reflected in the -6% single-day drop on July 6, 2026. (2) Financial risk – negative shareholders' equity (debt-to-equity -4.97) and a current ratio of 0.901 indicate tight liquidity, while interest expense of $148.6 million consumes 12.7% of operating income. (3) Growth risk – revenue growth decelerated to +5.64% YoY in Q4 2026, and further slowdown could lead to earnings estimate cuts. (4) Macro risk – with 86% of revenue domestic, a US recession could reduce DIY and DIFM demand. Ranked by severity: competitive threat is highest, followed by growth deceleration, then financial leverage.
The 12-month forecast has three scenarios: Bull (25% probability) targeting $4,000–$4,800, Base (55%) targeting $3,400–$3,800, and Bear (20%) targeting $2,730–$3,000. The base case is most likely, assuming revenue growth of 5–6%, stable margins, and no major competitive disruption, leading the stock toward the analyst average target of $3,719.96. The key assumption is that same-store sales stabilize and the O'Reilly/NAPA deal does not materialize. The bull case requires reacceleration in same-store sales and successful international expansion, while the bear case assumes competitive share loss and a consumer pullback.
AZO appears undervalued relative to its own history. The trailing PE of 18.97x is well below the 22.4x–34.1x range seen during fiscal 2026 and far below the 30.6x at Q1 2026. The forward PE of 16.22x represents a ~14.5% discount to trailing earnings, and the PEG ratio of 3.86 suggests the market is pricing in slow growth. Compared to peers, AutoZone has historically commanded a premium, but at ~19x it now trades closer to parity. The market is paying a fair price for a high-quality business with decelerating growth; the valuation implies expectations of mid-single-digit revenue growth and stable margins, which seems reasonable given the 53.34% gross margin and 14.13% net margin.
From a risk/reward perspective, AZO offers a favorable setup for long-term investors. The stock trades at 18.97x trailing earnings, below its historical range, and the analyst consensus strong_buy with a $3,719.96 average target implies +19.2% upside. The low target of $3,000 is only -3.9% below the current price, providing a margin of safety. However, the biggest downside risk is a continued deceleration in same-store sales or competitive disruption from O'Reilly/NAPA, which could push the stock toward its 52-week low of $2,730.65 (-12.5%). For investors with a 2–3 year horizon and tolerance for near-term volatility, AZO is a good buy at current levels, but those seeking immediate momentum should wait for a breakout above $3,300.
AZO is more suitable for long-term investment given its low beta (0.398), consistent buyback program, and market leadership, but the current volatility and competitive uncertainty make short-term trading risky. The stock has a -35.88% max drawdown over the past year and is down -22.14% over 12 months, indicating high idiosyncratic risk. There is no dividend (payout ratio 0%), so returns depend entirely on price appreciation. Earnings visibility is moderate, with analyst EPS estimates ranging $250.60–$262.79 for the forward year. A suggested minimum holding period is 2–3 years to allow for the growth deceleration to play out and for the competitive landscape to clarify. Short-term traders could exploit the recent +9.53% one-month rally but should use tight stop-losses near the $2,730 support.
